Structure of Bee Communities in Marginal Lands of the Puget Sound, <scp>USA</scp>

Wild bee communities in urban ecosystems are often challenged by habitat fragmentation and low floral diversity. In such settings, marginal land surrounding airports or in power line corridors may support bees, even with small habitat patches. However, temporal surveys of wild bees are lacking for many urban areas such as the Puget Sound region of western Washington State, USA. Here, we conducted wild bee surveys at three peri-urban sites in the Puget Sound over 7 years. Specifically, a standardized protocol was used to sample wild bee communities monthly from April to October at two sites associated with airports and one site in a power line corridor. In total, our surveys collected 25,441 specimens representing 118 confirmed species within 24 genera, with individual subsites having between 15 and 35 species in any year. The Halictidae represented the largest number of individuals collected, with 47% of specimens. By genus, <i>Lasioglossum</i> was the most speciose (<i>n</i> = 21), with <i>Bombus</i>, <i>Osmia</i>, and <i>Andrena</i> also ubiquitous and diverse. Bee diversity was high across spring and summer, and our surveys resolved the presumptive overlap of parasites with their hosts. Our study shows that marginal lands requiring little management can support diverse wild bee communities in urban areas. Our work also provides a baseline for future evaluations of wild bee communities in the Puget Sound and broader Pacific Northwest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72049
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure of Bee Communities in Marginal Lands of the Puget Sound, USA

Riley M. Anderson, Robert W. Redmond, David W. Crowder, Evan Sugden et al.
1 links
Ecology and Evolution
Plant and animal studies
article

Structure of Bee Communities in Marginal Lands of the Puget Sound, USA

Riley M. Anderson, Robert W. Redmond, David W. Crowder, Evan Sugden, Will Peterman
article en

Abstract

Wild bee communities in urban ecosystems are often challenged by habitat fragmentation and low floral diversity. In such settings, marginal land surrounding airports or in power line corridors may support bees, even with small habitat patches. However, temporal surveys of wild bees are lacking for many urban areas such as the Puget Sound region of western Washington State, USA. Here, we conducted wild bee surveys at three peri-urban sites in the Puget Sound over 7 years. Specifically, a standardized protocol was used to sample wild bee communities monthly from April to October at two sites associated with airports and one site in a power line corridor. In total, our surveys collected 25,441 specimens representing 118 confirmed species within 24 genera, with individual subsites having between 15 and 35 species in any year. The Halictidae represented the largest number of individuals collected, with 47% of specimens. By genus, <i>Lasioglossum</i> was the most speciose (<i>n</i> = 21), with <i>Bombus</i>, <i>Osmia</i>, and <i>Andrena</i> also ubiquitous and diverse. Bee diversity was high across spring and summer, and our surveys resolved the presumptive overlap of parasites with their hosts. Our study shows that marginal lands requiring little management can support diverse wild bee communities in urban areas. Our work also provides a baseline for future evaluations of wild bee communities in the Puget Sound and broader Pacific Northwest.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(9)
Utah State University (US), Creative Commons (US), Washington Sea Grant (US), Washington State University (US)
U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bullitt Foundation, Ohio State University, Washington State University, Washington State Department of Agriculture, University of California, Davis, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.