Confronting the Past? Public Norms, Private Truths, and the Politics of Memory in Post-WWII Germany

How do nations confront a history of past atrocities? Can public efforts to address the past shift private views, or do they merely establish social norms fostering the misrepresentation of stigmatized preferences? A prime example of confronting the past is post-war Germany, shaped by the legacy of Nazism's atrocities in World War II. Decades later, we examine how public recognition of collective guilt through discourse, education, and culture has shaped German identity and attitudes towards the country's history. Using a large online survey and an experimental treatment, we distinguish private preferences from their public expression. Our findings reveal that low national pride and muted emotional ties to German history are internalized rather than driven by social desirability. However, a stigma persists around publicly expressing a desire to move beyond a perpetrator-focused narrative. This study underscores both the potential and the limits of public recognition of a nation's historical sins.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/pcu7e_v2
Primary Topic
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confronting the Past? Public Norms, Private Truths, and the Politics of Memory in Post-WWII Germany

Daniel Ziblatt, Elias Dinas, Vasiliki Fouka
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
article

Confronting the Past? Public Norms, Private Truths, and the Politics of Memory in Post-WWII Germany

Daniel Ziblatt, Elias Dinas, Vasiliki Fouka
article en

Abstract

How do nations confront a history of past atrocities? Can public efforts to address the past shift private views, or do they merely establish social norms fostering the misrepresentation of stigmatized preferences? A prime example of confronting the past is post-war Germany, shaped by the legacy of Nazism's atrocities in World War II. Decades later, we examine how public recognition of collective guilt through discourse, education, and culture has shaped German identity and attitudes towards the country's history. Using a large online survey and an experimental treatment, we distinguish private preferences from their public expression. Our findings reveal that low national pride and muted emotional ties to German history are internalized rather than driven by social desirability. However, a stigma persists around publicly expressing a desire to move beyond a perpetrator-focused narrative. This study underscores both the potential and the limits of public recognition of a nation's historical sins.

Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Confronting the Past? Public Norms, Private Truths, and the Politics of Memory in Post-WWII Germany — Daniel Ziblatt, Elias Dinas, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS