Research on Forest Carbon Sequestration and Its Economic Valuation: A Case Study of the Zixi Mountain Nature Reserve, Chuxiong Prefecture

Improving the precision of forest vegetation carbon stock estimation is essential for scientifically evaluating its economic value and ecological benefits. This study aims to investigate the impact of different estimation methods on carbon stock and its economic value. Taking the forest vegetation of the Zixi Mountain Nature Reserve as the research object, the carbon stock of the arbor layer was estimated using four approaches: the variable biomass expansion factor method, the biomass expansion factor method, the volume conversion method, and the continuous function method of the biomass conversion factor. The carbon stocks of economic forests and shrublands were estimated using the average biomass method. The economic value of forest carbon storage was then evaluated through the market value method and the optimal pricing approach for forest carbon sinks. The results revealed no significant differences among the four estimation methods. The estimated arbor forest carbon stocks were 692,548.39 tC, 672,599.83 tC, 673,161.07 tC, and 400,369.17 tC, respectively, with an overall average of 609,669.62 tC. The biomass expansion factor method and the volume conversion method produce the most consistent results. The corresponding relative errors were 13.59%, 10.32%, 10.41%, and -34.33%, respectively. The continuous function method of the biomass conversion factor exhibited the greatest variability, mainly due to the influence of <i>Pinus yunnanensis</i> parameters. Among all methods, the biomass expansion factor method yielded the smallest relative error, making it the most suitable for estimating arbor carbon stocks in the study area. The total average economic value of forest carbon storage in the region was estimated at CNY 58.09 million. Among all forest types, <i>Pinus yunnanensis</i> contributed the highest carbon value, totaling CNY 50.48 million. In terms of economic value per unit area, <i>Pinus armandii</i> ranked first, with CNY 11,418.92 per hectare. Among different age groups of arbor forests, middle-aged stands had the highest carbon sequestration value, reaching CNY 36.87 million. Across all functional zones, the core zone showed the greatest economic value at CNY 29.34 million. Enhancing forest resource protection to maximize both carbon sink capacity and economic returns, as well as promoting forest carbon trading, can bring additional economic benefits to Southwest China while contributing to the achievement of the national "dual carbon" goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172746
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Forest Carbon Sequestration and Its Economic Valuation: A Case Study of the Zixi Mountain Nature Reserve, Chuxiong Prefecture

Zhihua Deng, Chen Aimei, Shaohui Yang, Mengxue Pu
1 links
Plants
Forest Management and Policy
article

Research on Forest Carbon Sequestration and Its Economic Valuation: A Case Study of the Zixi Mountain Nature Reserve, Chuxiong Prefecture

Zhihua Deng, Chen Aimei, Shaohui Yang, Mengxue Pu
article en

Abstract

Improving the precision of forest vegetation carbon stock estimation is essential for scientifically evaluating its economic value and ecological benefits. This study aims to investigate the impact of different estimation methods on carbon stock and its economic value. Taking the forest vegetation of the Zixi Mountain Nature Reserve as the research object, the carbon stock of the arbor layer was estimated using four approaches: the variable biomass expansion factor method, the biomass expansion factor method, the volume conversion method, and the continuous function method of the biomass conversion factor. The carbon stocks of economic forests and shrublands were estimated using the average biomass method. The economic value of forest carbon storage was then evaluated through the market value method and the optimal pricing approach for forest carbon sinks. The results revealed no significant differences among the four estimation methods. The estimated arbor forest carbon stocks were 692,548.39 tC, 672,599.83 tC, 673,161.07 tC, and 400,369.17 tC, respectively, with an overall average of 609,669.62 tC. The biomass expansion factor method and the volume conversion method produce the most consistent results. The corresponding relative errors were 13.59%, 10.32%, 10.41%, and -34.33%, respectively. The continuous function method of the biomass conversion factor exhibited the greatest variability, mainly due to the influence of <i>Pinus yunnanensis</i> parameters. Among all methods, the biomass expansion factor method yielded the smallest relative error, making it the most suitable for estimating arbor carbon stocks in the study area. The total average economic value of forest carbon storage in the region was estimated at CNY 58.09 million. Among all forest types, <i>Pinus yunnanensis</i> contributed the highest carbon value, totaling CNY 50.48 million. In terms of economic value per unit area, <i>Pinus armandii</i> ranked first, with CNY 11,418.92 per hectare. Among different age groups of arbor forests, middle-aged stands had the highest carbon sequestration value, reaching CNY 36.87 million. Across all functional zones, the core zone showed the greatest economic value at CNY 29.34 million. Enhancing forest resource protection to maximize both carbon sink capacity and economic returns, as well as promoting forest carbon trading, can bring additional economic benefits to Southwest China while contributing to the achievement of the national "dual carbon" goals.

PlantsVol. 14(17)
Southwest Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.