Analyzing Safety Management Failure Paths in Coal Mines via the 24Model Accident Causation Framework and fsQCA

This study investigated safety management performance in small- and medium-sized private coal mining enterprises (SMPCMEs) through an integrated application of the 24Model accident causation theory and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Analyzing 40 sudden incidents (2013–2023), we examined six key factors—organizational, individual, and external dimensions—to identify nonlinear risk pathways. Results revealed four critical failure types—Internally Balanced (cultural–behavioral–environmental collapse), Safety Culture–Deficient (institutional hollowing), Cultural–External Environment (policy-implementation paradox), and External Environment–Integrated (technological-regulatory failure)—that collectively explained 83% of performance variance. Tailored strategies, including IoT-based real-time monitoring and AI-driven inspections, are proposed to transition from fragmented interventions to systemic governance. These findings provide actionable insights for enhancing safety resilience in high-risk mining sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11030084
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Safety Management Failure Paths in Coal Mines via the 24Model Accident Causation Framework and fsQCA

Li Wang, Wanxin Xu, Li Jiang
Safety
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Analyzing Safety Management Failure Paths in Coal Mines via the 24Model Accident Causation Framework and fsQCA

Li Wang, Wanxin Xu, Li Jiang
article en

Abstract

This study investigated safety management performance in small- and medium-sized private coal mining enterprises (SMPCMEs) through an integrated application of the 24Model accident causation theory and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Analyzing 40 sudden incidents (2013–2023), we examined six key factors—organizational, individual, and external dimensions—to identify nonlinear risk pathways. Results revealed four critical failure types—Internally Balanced (cultural–behavioral–environmental collapse), Safety Culture–Deficient (institutional hollowing), Cultural–External Environment (policy-implementation paradox), and External Environment–Integrated (technological-regulatory failure)—that collectively explained 83% of performance variance. Tailored strategies, including IoT-based real-time monitoring and AI-driven inspections, are proposed to transition from fragmented interventions to systemic governance. These findings provide actionable insights for enhancing safety resilience in high-risk mining sectors.

SafetyVol. 11(3)
Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing Safety Management Failure Paths in Coal Mines via the 24Model Accident Causation Framework and fsQCA — Li Wang, Wanxin Xu, et al. · Safety (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS