Grazing system and body weight of Tibetan sheep influence biomass allocation and decomposition in alpine meadows

Grazing affects the allocation of aboveground biomass (AGB), and decomposition of litter and dung, thereby regulating material flow in grassland ecosystems. However, the combined effects of grazing system (GS) and body weight (BW) on biomass allocation remain unclear. This study had conducted a two-year experiment in an alpine meadow of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), in order to examine the effects of two GS (continuous grazing - CG, and rotational grazing - RG) and three BWs of Tibetan sheep (23.3, 35.4, and 41.9 kg) on biomass allocation. At the three BW levels, compared to no grazing, CG reduced AGB by 20.9 %, 29.8 %, and 40.8 %, respectively, while RG reduced it by 30.4 %, 37.3 %, and 46.6 %. CG reduced litter decomposition mass by 20.1 %, 27.5 %, and 43.8 %, respectively, while RG reduced it by 22.1 %, 41.0 %, and 54.4 %, respectively. Compared to CG, RG increased dung decomposition mass by 41.6 %, 53.2 %, and 44.4 %, respectively. BW, GS, and GS × BW contributed 72.1 %, -64.0 %, and -11.2 % to litter daily decomposition rate (LDDR), respectively. The contributions were 95.2 %, -21.7 %, and 4.5 % for dung daily decomposition rate (DDDR), and -69.4 %, 25.8 %, and -6.8 % for total matter turnover. RG's LDDR and DDDR were both higher than CG, with DDDR increasing faster than LDDR. RG demonstrates a greater allocation to intake and dung matter turnover compared to CG, particularly at higher BW levels. The findings suggest the significance of GS and BW in biomass allocation and decomposition, providing valuable insights for sustainable grassland management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127157
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grazing system and body weight of Tibetan sheep influence biomass allocation and decomposition in alpine meadows

Weikang Zhao, Fujiang Hou, Yan Zhang, Yi Sun
1 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
2.42
article

Grazing system and body weight of Tibetan sheep influence biomass allocation and decomposition in alpine meadows

Weikang Zhao, Fujiang Hou, Yan Zhang, Yi Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Grazing affects the allocation of aboveground biomass (AGB), and decomposition of litter and dung, thereby regulating material flow in grassland ecosystems. However, the combined effects of grazing system (GS) and body weight (BW) on biomass allocation remain unclear. This study had conducted a two-year experiment in an alpine meadow of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), in order to examine the effects of two GS (continuous grazing - CG, and rotational grazing - RG) and three BWs of Tibetan sheep (23.3, 35.4, and 41.9 kg) on biomass allocation. At the three BW levels, compared to no grazing, CG reduced AGB by 20.9 %, 29.8 %, and 40.8 %, respectively, while RG reduced it by 30.4 %, 37.3 %, and 46.6 %. CG reduced litter decomposition mass by 20.1 %, 27.5 %, and 43.8 %, respectively, while RG reduced it by 22.1 %, 41.0 %, and 54.4 %, respectively. Compared to CG, RG increased dung decomposition mass by 41.6 %, 53.2 %, and 44.4 %, respectively. BW, GS, and GS × BW contributed 72.1 %, -64.0 %, and -11.2 % to litter daily decomposition rate (LDDR), respectively. The contributions were 95.2 %, -21.7 %, and 4.5 % for dung daily decomposition rate (DDDR), and -69.4 %, 25.8 %, and -6.8 % for total matter turnover. RG's LDDR and DDDR were both higher than CG, with DDDR increasing faster than LDDR. RG demonstrates a greater allocation to intake and dung matter turnover compared to CG, particularly at higher BW levels. The findings suggest the significance of GS and BW in biomass allocation and decomposition, providing valuable insights for sustainable grassland management.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 393
Ministry of Agriculture (EE)
Lanzhou University, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.