Fleet sizing with price-sensitive customers in Attended Home Delivery

Retailers offering Attended Home Delivery (AHD) struggle with thin profit margins due to high delivery costs and constrained routing flexibility. AHD requires retailers and customers to agree on specific time windows, limiting operational efficiency and increasing fleet requirements, particularly when customer preferences tend to cluster around peak times. While retailers have some ability to influence customer choices through pricing and availability strategies, failing to account for fleet costs and delivery constraints can lead to inefficient operations and reduced profitability. This study introduces an integrated approach to fleet sizing and time-window pricing for price-sensitive customers. We propose a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model that maximizes profit by balancing revenue and delivery costs, leveraging a nonparametric rank-based choice model to capture customer behavior while explicitly considering routing constraints and fleet ownership expenses over multiple periods. Using computational experiments on small-sized instances inspired by real-world data, we evaluate the impact of explicitly modeling routing costs, compare different pricing strategies, examine the effects of multi-period fleet planning, and assess sensitivity to varying customer and cost conditions. Results show that explicitly modeling routing constraints reduces profit loss by 29% compared to traditional cost approximations but increases computational complexity. To address this, we develop a Fix & Optimize (F&O) matheuristic approximate solution method that enables the application of our model to larger instances. Our findings emphasize the need for retailers to integrate demand management and fleet planning to optimize operational profitability. • Integrated fleet sizing and time-window static pricing model for Attended Home Delivery. • Multi-period fleet planning approach balances demand fluctuations and fleet costs. • Explicit routing constraints reduce profit loss by 29% but increase computational complexity. • Fix & Optimize matheuristic improves scalability for large-scale fleet planning. • Retailers benefit from integrating demand management with fleet optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104388
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fleet sizing with price-sensitive customers in Attended Home Delivery

Fábio Neves-Moreira, Devon Fernandes, Pedro Amorim
Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Fleet sizing with price-sensitive customers in Attended Home Delivery

Fábio Neves-Moreira, Devon Fernandes, Pedro Amorim
article en

Abstract

Retailers offering Attended Home Delivery (AHD) struggle with thin profit margins due to high delivery costs and constrained routing flexibility. AHD requires retailers and customers to agree on specific time windows, limiting operational efficiency and increasing fleet requirements, particularly when customer preferences tend to cluster around peak times. While retailers have some ability to influence customer choices through pricing and availability strategies, failing to account for fleet costs and delivery constraints can lead to inefficient operations and reduced profitability. This study introduces an integrated approach to fleet sizing and time-window pricing for price-sensitive customers. We propose a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model that maximizes profit by balancing revenue and delivery costs, leveraging a nonparametric rank-based choice model to capture customer behavior while explicitly considering routing constraints and fleet ownership expenses over multiple periods. Using computational experiments on small-sized instances inspired by real-world data, we evaluate the impact of explicitly modeling routing costs, compare different pricing strategies, examine the effects of multi-period fleet planning, and assess sensitivity to varying customer and cost conditions. Results show that explicitly modeling routing constraints reduces profit loss by 29% compared to traditional cost approximations but increases computational complexity. To address this, we develop a Fix & Optimize (F&O) matheuristic approximate solution method that enables the application of our model to larger instances. Our findings emphasize the need for retailers to integrate demand management and fleet planning to optimize operational profitability. • Integrated fleet sizing and time-window static pricing model for Attended Home Delivery. • Multi-period fleet planning approach balances demand fluctuations and fleet costs. • Explicit routing constraints reduce profit loss by 29% but increase computational complexity. • Fix & Optimize matheuristic improves scalability for large-scale fleet planning. • Retailers benefit from integrating demand management with fleet optimization.

Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation ReviewVol. 204
Universidade do Porto (PT), INESC TEC (PT)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.