Medicaid coverage of male infertility treatments

Background: Infertility treatments are costly and have poor coverage, thereby deterring or limiting access to care. Medicaid patients are even less likely than the average patient to pursue intervention and there is limited transparency of coverage of fertility interventions. We aimed to evaluate Medicaid reimbursement of common interventions used for the diagnosis and/or treatment of male infertility. Methods: Physician fee schedules were accessed for the year 2023. Current procedural terminology codes utilized for male infertility interventions were evaluated. The Medicaid physician fee index was accessed on a state by state basis. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine whether reimbursements were attributable to a state’s tendency to reimburse more for Medicaid services. Results: 49 states publish accessible physician fee schedules. No states offered reimbursement for microscopic testicular extraction of sperm thus requiring coding alternatives. Certain procedures were covered by every state (testis biopsy), while others were rarely covered (vasovasostomy). Reimbursement patterns significantly varied based on the state physician fee index, although these were weak correlations. Conclusions: Discrepancies in coverage and reimbursement for fertility procedures is evident. The absence of clear methodology regarding coverage and reimbursement contribute to poor transparency within Medicaid which may be partially responsible for the underutilization of infertility treatments among Medicaid patients.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Men s Health
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2025.107
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medicaid coverage of male infertility treatments

1 links
Journal of Men s Health
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Medicaid coverage of male infertility treatments

article en

Abstract

Background: Infertility treatments are costly and have poor coverage, thereby deterring or limiting access to care. Medicaid patients are even less likely than the average patient to pursue intervention and there is limited transparency of coverage of fertility interventions. We aimed to evaluate Medicaid reimbursement of common interventions used for the diagnosis and/or treatment of male infertility. Methods: Physician fee schedules were accessed for the year 2023. Current procedural terminology codes utilized for male infertility interventions were evaluated. The Medicaid physician fee index was accessed on a state by state basis. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine whether reimbursements were attributable to a state’s tendency to reimburse more for Medicaid services. Results: 49 states publish accessible physician fee schedules. No states offered reimbursement for microscopic testicular extraction of sperm thus requiring coding alternatives. Certain procedures were covered by every state (testis biopsy), while others were rarely covered (vasovasostomy). Reimbursement patterns significantly varied based on the state physician fee index, although these were weak correlations. Conclusions: Discrepancies in coverage and reimbursement for fertility procedures is evident. The absence of clear methodology regarding coverage and reimbursement contribute to poor transparency within Medicaid which may be partially responsible for the underutilization of infertility treatments among Medicaid patients.

Journal of Men s HealthVol. 21(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Medicaid coverage of male infertility treatments · Journal of Men s Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS