Modulating Multisensory Processing: Interactions Between Semantic Congruence and Temporal Synchrony

Presenting information to multiple sensory modalities often facilitates or interferes with processing, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. Using a Stroop-like task, the two reported experiments examined how semantic congruency and incongruency in one sensory modality affect processing and responding in a different modality. Participants were presented with pictures and sounds simultaneously (Experiment 1) or asynchronously (Experiment 2) and had to respond whether the visual or auditory stimulus was an animal or vehicle, while ignoring the other modality. Semantic congruency and incongruency in the unattended modality both affected responses in the attended modality, with visual stimuli having larger effects on auditory processing than the reverse (Experiment 1). Effects of visual input on auditory processing decreased under longer SOAs, while effects of auditory input on visual processing increased over SOAs and were correlated with relative processing speed (Experiment 2). These results suggest that congruence and modality both impact multisensory processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vision
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9030074
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modulating Multisensory Processing: Interactions Between Semantic Congruence and Temporal Synchrony

Susan Geffen, Christopher W. Robinson, Taylor Beck
Vision
Multisensory perception and integration
article

Modulating Multisensory Processing: Interactions Between Semantic Congruence and Temporal Synchrony

Susan Geffen, Christopher W. Robinson, Taylor Beck
article en

Abstract

Presenting information to multiple sensory modalities often facilitates or interferes with processing, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. Using a Stroop-like task, the two reported experiments examined how semantic congruency and incongruency in one sensory modality affect processing and responding in a different modality. Participants were presented with pictures and sounds simultaneously (Experiment 1) or asynchronously (Experiment 2) and had to respond whether the visual or auditory stimulus was an animal or vehicle, while ignoring the other modality. Semantic congruency and incongruency in the unattended modality both affected responses in the attended modality, with visual stimuli having larger effects on auditory processing than the reverse (Experiment 1). Effects of visual input on auditory processing decreased under longer SOAs, while effects of auditory input on visual processing increased over SOAs and were correlated with relative processing speed (Experiment 2). These results suggest that congruence and modality both impact multisensory processing.

VisionVol. 9(3)
The Ohio State University Newark (US), Occidental College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Multisensory perception and integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.