Automating and optimising pushback selection using reinforcement learning

Pushback optimisation, an early phase of strategic open pit planning, shapes mining phases that guide extraction for the mine's life and strongly influences operational feasibility and economic value. The task unfolds in two steps: first, a set of nested pits is generated; second, a subset of these pits is chosen, defining the pushbacks. Selecting pushbacks is hard because it must meet several operational criteria and has an impact on the production schedule, and thus the project's NPV. Existing tools offer partial help but still depend on manual judgment and rough schedules, often preventing optimal solutions. This study presents an automated pushback-selection method built on reinforcement learning (RL). An RL agent learns, through interactions with the nested-pit environment, to select the pushback set that maximises NPV while respecting key constraints, minimum mining width (MMW), waste-to-ore ratio, balanced tonnage swings, and full use of mining and processing capacities. The framework is tested on the publicly available McLaughlin mine dataset, with emphasis on maintaining the MMW constraint. Results show the RL approach is efficient and economically superior: it produces pushbacks whose NPV is 9% higher than mining every nested pit sequentially. These outcomes underscore RL's promise for automated, constraint-aware pushback optimisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25726668251371946
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mining Techniques and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating and optimising pushback selection using reinforcement learning

Nelson Morales, Parisa Akbari, Santiago Valencia
2 citations
Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy
Mining Techniques and Economics
2.43
article

Automating and optimising pushback selection using reinforcement learning

Nelson Morales, Parisa Akbari, Santiago Valencia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pushback optimisation, an early phase of strategic open pit planning, shapes mining phases that guide extraction for the mine's life and strongly influences operational feasibility and economic value. The task unfolds in two steps: first, a set of nested pits is generated; second, a subset of these pits is chosen, defining the pushbacks. Selecting pushbacks is hard because it must meet several operational criteria and has an impact on the production schedule, and thus the project's NPV. Existing tools offer partial help but still depend on manual judgment and rough schedules, often preventing optimal solutions. This study presents an automated pushback-selection method built on reinforcement learning (RL). An RL agent learns, through interactions with the nested-pit environment, to select the pushback set that maximises NPV while respecting key constraints, minimum mining width (MMW), waste-to-ore ratio, balanced tonnage swings, and full use of mining and processing capacities. The framework is tested on the publicly available McLaughlin mine dataset, with emphasis on maintaining the MMW constraint. Results show the RL approach is efficient and economically superior: it produces pushbacks whose NPV is 9% higher than mining every nested pit sequentially. These outcomes underscore RL's promise for automated, constraint-aware pushback optimisation.

Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and MetallurgyVol. 134(4)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CA), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA), Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Polytechnique Montréal, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mining Techniques and Economics
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.