The Role of Mentorship and Dynastic Codes in the Formation of Students’ Sectoral Identity

The article examines the phenomenon of students’ industry identity as a result of the interaction of pedagogi-cal, social, cultural and symbolic factors. Particular attention is paid to the role of mentorship and dynastic codes in the process of forming a sustainable industry identity. An integral model of this process is presented, including five components: mentoring, dynasticity, symbolic environment, reflection and communicative inter-action. It outlines potential applications of the model in diagnostics, educational environment design, and insti-tutionalization of intergenerational practices. Empirical validation is based on case studies of students from transport and engineering universities engaged in mentorship and dynastic programs. The findings confirm that a combination of meaningful mentorship, intergenerational continuity, and reflective support contributes to the formation of a stable professional identity and enhances students’ engagement with the sectoral communi-ty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Общество социология психология педагогика
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2025.8.12
Primary Topic
Psychology of Development and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Mentorship and Dynastic Codes in the Formation of Students’ Sectoral Identity

Mariia A. Pyrkova
Общество социология психология педагогика
Psychology of Development and Education
article

The Role of Mentorship and Dynastic Codes in the Formation of Students’ Sectoral Identity

Mariia A. Pyrkova
article en

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of students’ industry identity as a result of the interaction of pedagogi-cal, social, cultural and symbolic factors. Particular attention is paid to the role of mentorship and dynastic codes in the process of forming a sustainable industry identity. An integral model of this process is presented, including five components: mentoring, dynasticity, symbolic environment, reflection and communicative inter-action. It outlines potential applications of the model in diagnostics, educational environment design, and insti-tutionalization of intergenerational practices. Empirical validation is based on case studies of students from transport and engineering universities engaged in mentorship and dynastic programs. The findings confirm that a combination of meaningful mentorship, intergenerational continuity, and reflective support contributes to the formation of a stable professional identity and enhances students’ engagement with the sectoral communi-ty.

Общество социология психология педагогика(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Psychology of Development and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Mentorship and Dynastic Codes in the Formation of Students’ Sectoral Identity — Mariia A. Pyrkova · Общество социология психология педагогика (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS