A supportive work environment matters: validating a concise scale and specifying its contributions to emotional experiences among second language teachers

The integration of positive psychology into second language (L2) education has generated increasing interest in L2 teachers’ perceptions of a supportive work environment (SWE), given its close relationship with their mental health. However, a reliable and concise scale to measure this perception, with strong psychometric properties, has yet to be developed. This study aims to address this gap by developing a streamlined version of the Supportive Work Environment Scale (SWES) and specifying its contributions to emotional experiences, a crucial component of mental health. The study involved two samples, totaling 753 Chinese L2 teachers. In Sample 1 (n = 351), exploratory factor analysis identified a three-factor structure for the SWES, consisting of 20 items across three factors: school support, supervisor support, and colleague support. Confirmatory factor analysis conducted on Sample 2 (n = 402) supported the model’s fit. The SWES also demonstrated good convergent validity, discriminant validity, and internal consistency. Additionally, it showed that enjoyment was most strongly linked to school support, pride to supervisor support, anxiety to colleague support, and anger to school support. These findings suggest that the SWES is an effective tool for assessing L2 teachers’ perceptions of SWE and underscores its role in shaping their emotional experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05846-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A supportive work environment matters: validating a concise scale and specifying its contributions to emotional experiences among second language teachers

Hanwei Wu, Feiyang Liao
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
2.44
article

A supportive work environment matters: validating a concise scale and specifying its contributions to emotional experiences among second language teachers

Hanwei Wu, Feiyang Liao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of positive psychology into second language (L2) education has generated increasing interest in L2 teachers’ perceptions of a supportive work environment (SWE), given its close relationship with their mental health. However, a reliable and concise scale to measure this perception, with strong psychometric properties, has yet to be developed. This study aims to address this gap by developing a streamlined version of the Supportive Work Environment Scale (SWES) and specifying its contributions to emotional experiences, a crucial component of mental health. The study involved two samples, totaling 753 Chinese L2 teachers. In Sample 1 (n = 351), exploratory factor analysis identified a three-factor structure for the SWES, consisting of 20 items across three factors: school support, supervisor support, and colleague support. Confirmatory factor analysis conducted on Sample 2 (n = 402) supported the model’s fit. The SWES also demonstrated good convergent validity, discriminant validity, and internal consistency. Additionally, it showed that enjoyment was most strongly linked to school support, pride to supervisor support, anxiety to colleague support, and anger to school support. These findings suggest that the SWES is an effective tool for assessing L2 teachers’ perceptions of SWE and underscores its role in shaping their emotional experiences.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Hunan Normal University (CN), Guangxi Normal University (CN), Changsha Normal University (CN)
Education Department of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.