Comparative clinical outcomes of dual cannulated screw-cable system vs. Kirschner wire-cable fixation in type C patellar fractures
Compared with KWC fixation, the DCSC system provides superior early functional recovery, fewer complications, and faster fracture healing, particularly in complex intra-articular fractures (OTA 34-C2). However, the benefits of the DCSC system in simpler or more comminuted fracture (C1/C3) diminish over time, and caution is warranted when using this system in comminuted or distal coronal plane fractures owing to potential compression limitations. These findings support the use of DCSC as a first-line option for C2 fractures, although long-term studies are needed to assess implant durability.
Authors
- Fangda Si (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-5285)
- Lei Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-7818)
- Xiaodong Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-5989)
- Ying Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5654-0108)
- Jiaqi Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9775-2342)
- Huan Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1863-1524)
- Yusong Yuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6601-6363)
Institutions
- China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Surgery
- Published
- 2025-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1594907
- Primary Topic
- Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- China-Japan Friendship Hospital