Xinjiang in Postwar China’s Frontier Politics, 1945-1949: A Reassessment

This study will demonstrate that, as early as the end of the Sino-Japanese war in summer 1945, both Han and non-Han Chinese bureaucrats who dominated China’s northwest were already undertaking political activities of their own, relatively independently of intervention by the Nationalist central government. In other words, during the initial stages of the postwar interregnum, an ostensibly “KMT-ruled” Xinjiang province was behaving not unlike other Chinese ethnic frontier regions, such as Outer Mongolia and Tibet. The Nationalist leaders in the northwest borderlands, like their Tibetan and Mongolian counterparts, appeared to be following their own independent policy line, a line that might eventually have led them away from the political, diplomatic and military orbit of metropolitan Nationalist China. Postwar China’s Central Asian political landscape was thus more intriguing and complicated than one might imagine.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhss.v15p11
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Xinjiang in Postwar China’s Frontier Politics, 1945-1949: A Reassessment

Li Wang
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
article

Xinjiang in Postwar China’s Frontier Politics, 1945-1949: A Reassessment

Li Wang
article en

Abstract

This study will demonstrate that, as early as the end of the Sino-Japanese war in summer 1945, both Han and non-Han Chinese bureaucrats who dominated China’s northwest were already undertaking political activities of their own, relatively independently of intervention by the Nationalist central government. In other words, during the initial stages of the postwar interregnum, an ostensibly “KMT-ruled” Xinjiang province was behaving not unlike other Chinese ethnic frontier regions, such as Outer Mongolia and Tibet. The Nationalist leaders in the northwest borderlands, like their Tibetan and Mongolian counterparts, appeared to be following their own independent policy line, a line that might eventually have led them away from the political, diplomatic and military orbit of metropolitan Nationalist China. Postwar China’s Central Asian political landscape was thus more intriguing and complicated than one might imagine.

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.