Global spillover asymmetry in Africa: implications for regional monetary integration

Purpose This study aims to explore how global shocks affect African economies through different transmission channels, with a special focus on what these asymmetries mean for Africa’s unified monetary space. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a Global Vector Autoregressive (GVAR) model covering 87 countries, 48 from Africa, over the period 1970–2023. African economies are grouped into four structural clusters: fragile states, agri-commodity exporters, oil-exporting nations and emerging markets. This typology enables a clearer view of how spillovers propagate and how macro-financial dynamics vary across the continent. Findings The results show that African emerging markets are more resilient to global shocks, whereas fragile and oil-exporting economies remain highly vulnerable. Economic fragility, more than resource dependence, emerges as the key barrier to convergence. Inflation is the main channel of global spillovers, whereas weak financial integration limits the role of capital flows. Fragile states experience stronger exchange rate pass-through, complicating nominal alignment. Fiscal spillovers are also uneven: trade-driven economies benefit, but debt-reliant states face greater imbalances. These suggest the need for fiscal coordination. Research limitations/implications A key limitation is the absence of comparisons with similarly structured economies in other regions such as Asia or Latin America. Adding such cases could offer useful contrasts in how institutions and regional settings influence spillovers and policy transmission. Practical implications This study advises against a rushed move toward an African Monetary Union. Instead, a stepwise approach, centered on financial deepening, macroeconomic stability and stronger institutions are vital to reducing asymmetries and building the groundwork for effective monetary union. Originality/value This is the first study to apply a GVAR approach to structurally clustered African economies. By shifting the focus from geography to structural characteristics, it presents fresh evidence on how diverse economic foundations shape Africa’s readiness for monetary integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-03-2025-0105
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global spillover asymmetry in Africa: implications for regional monetary integration

Wondaferahu Mulugeta, Jayamohan M.K., Minyahil Alemu
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Global spillover asymmetry in Africa: implications for regional monetary integration

Wondaferahu Mulugeta, Jayamohan M.K., Minyahil Alemu
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore how global shocks affect African economies through different transmission channels, with a special focus on what these asymmetries mean for Africa’s unified monetary space. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a Global Vector Autoregressive (GVAR) model covering 87 countries, 48 from Africa, over the period 1970–2023. African economies are grouped into four structural clusters: fragile states, agri-commodity exporters, oil-exporting nations and emerging markets. This typology enables a clearer view of how spillovers propagate and how macro-financial dynamics vary across the continent. Findings The results show that African emerging markets are more resilient to global shocks, whereas fragile and oil-exporting economies remain highly vulnerable. Economic fragility, more than resource dependence, emerges as the key barrier to convergence. Inflation is the main channel of global spillovers, whereas weak financial integration limits the role of capital flows. Fragile states experience stronger exchange rate pass-through, complicating nominal alignment. Fiscal spillovers are also uneven: trade-driven economies benefit, but debt-reliant states face greater imbalances. These suggest the need for fiscal coordination. Research limitations/implications A key limitation is the absence of comparisons with similarly structured economies in other regions such as Asia or Latin America. Adding such cases could offer useful contrasts in how institutions and regional settings influence spillovers and policy transmission. Practical implications This study advises against a rushed move toward an African Monetary Union. Instead, a stepwise approach, centered on financial deepening, macroeconomic stability and stronger institutions are vital to reducing asymmetries and building the groundwork for effective monetary union. Originality/value This is the first study to apply a GVAR approach to structurally clustered African economies. By shifting the focus from geography to structural characteristics, it presents fresh evidence on how diverse economic foundations shape Africa’s readiness for monetary integration.

Journal of Financial Economic PolicyVol. 18(3)
Jimma University (ET), Ethiopian Civil Service University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.