Lineage Capture Trade-offs: A Case Study in DuckDB

2 [3,4] a2 rid b1 b2 rid 2 1Figure 1: This figure shows the three lineage capture approaches evaluated in this paper on the query = 2,count( * ) ( ).(1) Query-Level: Rewrites the original query into + that augments lineage information with the output (Section 2.2). ( 2) Operator-Level: Transforms operators in the query plan to propagate lineage at the operator level, with the help of the Lineage Manager (LM) operator.Each LM operator removes lineage annotations from its child operator and, (except for the root) inserts a new ID column for tracking lineage in the parent operator (Section 2.3).(3) Function-Level: Modifies the implementation of physical operators to capture lineage artifacts-variables that track dependencies-during query execution (Section 2.4).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3736229.3736265
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lineage Capture Trade-offs: A Case Study in DuckDB

Haneen Mohammed, Eugene Wu
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

Lineage Capture Trade-offs: A Case Study in DuckDB

Haneen Mohammed, Eugene Wu
article en

Abstract

2 [3,4] a2 rid b1 b2 rid 2 1Figure 1: This figure shows the three lineage capture approaches evaluated in this paper on the query = 2,count( * ) ( ).(1) Query-Level: Rewrites the original query into + that augments lineage information with the output (Section 2.2). ( 2) Operator-Level: Transforms operators in the query plan to propagate lineage at the operator level, with the help of the Lineage Manager (LM) operator.Each LM operator removes lineage annotations from its child operator and, (except for the root) inserts a new ID column for tracking lineage in the parent operator (Section 2.3).(3) Function-Level: Modifies the implementation of physical operators to capture lineage artifacts-variables that track dependencies-during query execution (Section 2.4).

City University of Seattle (US), Columbia University (US)
National Science Foundation, Google
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.