Implicit and Explicit Processes in Language Acquisition and Learning: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Studies

The acquisition of English as a non-native language can occur in either second language (L2) or foreign language (FL) contexts, which differ significantly in the cognitive and neural processes involved. While L2 acquisition tends to rely on implicit and procedural mechanisms, FL learning is based on explicit and declarative processes. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, several studies have explored whether these contextual differences lead to distinct patterns of brain activation specific to English learning. A systematic review was conducted of studies published between 2015 and 2024 in the Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases. Empirical investigations employing neuroimaging techniques (DTI, EEG, ERP, fMRI, fNIRS) to analyze linguistic processing in English L2 or FL contexts were included. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, and refining the selection to focus exclusively on English, 18 primary studies were selected following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The reviewed studies indicate that English L2 acquisition in natural contexts predominantly activates multimodal networks associated with procedural memory, whereas English FL learning in formal educational settings involves greater activation of executive networks and declarative memory. Furthermore, differences in functional connectivity patterns were observed depending on the type of learning context. The evidence suggests that immersion contexts favor more automatic, holistic, and socially integrated linguistic processing, whereas classroom contexts promote more controlled and analytical processing. These findings underscore the need to adapt pedagogical strategies to the neurocognitive dynamics specific to each English learning context and highlight the importance of clearly distinguishing between L2 and FL in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of English Language
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n8p309
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit and Explicit Processes in Language Acquisition and Learning: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Studies

Margit Julia Guerra Ayala, Claret Aurelia Cuba-Raime, Gretel Emperatriz Zegobia-Vilca
World Journal of English Language
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Implicit and Explicit Processes in Language Acquisition and Learning: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Studies

Margit Julia Guerra Ayala, Claret Aurelia Cuba-Raime, Gretel Emperatriz Zegobia-Vilca
article en

Abstract

The acquisition of English as a non-native language can occur in either second language (L2) or foreign language (FL) contexts, which differ significantly in the cognitive and neural processes involved. While L2 acquisition tends to rely on implicit and procedural mechanisms, FL learning is based on explicit and declarative processes. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, several studies have explored whether these contextual differences lead to distinct patterns of brain activation specific to English learning. A systematic review was conducted of studies published between 2015 and 2024 in the Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases. Empirical investigations employing neuroimaging techniques (DTI, EEG, ERP, fMRI, fNIRS) to analyze linguistic processing in English L2 or FL contexts were included. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, and refining the selection to focus exclusively on English, 18 primary studies were selected following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The reviewed studies indicate that English L2 acquisition in natural contexts predominantly activates multimodal networks associated with procedural memory, whereas English FL learning in formal educational settings involves greater activation of executive networks and declarative memory. Furthermore, differences in functional connectivity patterns were observed depending on the type of learning context. The evidence suggests that immersion contexts favor more automatic, holistic, and socially integrated linguistic processing, whereas classroom contexts promote more controlled and analytical processing. These findings underscore the need to adapt pedagogical strategies to the neurocognitive dynamics specific to each English learning context and highlight the importance of clearly distinguishing between L2 and FL in future research.

World Journal of English LanguageVol. 15(8)
Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa (PE)
Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implicit and Explicit Processes in Language Acquisition and Learning: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Studies — Margit Julia Guerra Ayala, Claret Aurelia Cuba-Raime, et al. · World Journal of English Language (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS