Studi Kritis Argumentasi Quraniyyun dalam Buku Hadits: Satu Penilaian Semula Karya Kassim Ahmad

This article discusses the views of the Qur'aniyyun, a group that recognizes only the Qur'an as the sole source of law, rejecting the authority of Hadith. One of their prominent figures, Kassim Ahmad, in his book Hadith: A Re-evaluation, presents arguments that challenge the validity of Hadith. This research aims to critically examine these arguments using content analysis and library research methods, providing a systematic and structured refutation. Kassim Ahmad's arguments center on an exclusive understanding and interpretation of the Qur'an, without incorporating Hadith. This stance creates confusion among Muslims regarding the position of Hadith as a source of law. This article asserts that such a view is unacceptable because Hadith plays a vital role in explaining and complementing the laws found in the Qur'an. Therefore, Hadith cannot be separated from the Qur'an in the context of Islamic law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reslaj Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v7i9.9163
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studi Kritis Argumentasi Quraniyyun dalam Buku Hadits: Satu Penilaian Semula Karya Kassim Ahmad

Jajang Hidayatulloh, Engkos Kosasih, Muh. Arbiyansyah Nur
Reslaj Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Studi Kritis Argumentasi Quraniyyun dalam Buku Hadits: Satu Penilaian Semula Karya Kassim Ahmad

Jajang Hidayatulloh, Engkos Kosasih, Muh. Arbiyansyah Nur
article en

Abstract

This article discusses the views of the Qur'aniyyun, a group that recognizes only the Qur'an as the sole source of law, rejecting the authority of Hadith. One of their prominent figures, Kassim Ahmad, in his book Hadith: A Re-evaluation, presents arguments that challenge the validity of Hadith. This research aims to critically examine these arguments using content analysis and library research methods, providing a systematic and structured refutation. Kassim Ahmad's arguments center on an exclusive understanding and interpretation of the Qur'an, without incorporating Hadith. This stance creates confusion among Muslims regarding the position of Hadith as a source of law. This article asserts that such a view is unacceptable because Hadith plays a vital role in explaining and complementing the laws found in the Qur'an. Therefore, Hadith cannot be separated from the Qur'an in the context of Islamic law.

Reslaj Religion Education Social Laa Roiba JournalVol. 7(9)
Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor (ID), Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.