Global China's spatial ambition and area studies with geography

Abstract This paper critically evaluates the contemporary remaking of China's area studies and world geography as part of a nationalist project of spatial knowledge production, by examining an emerging landscape of individuals, institutions and ideologies. Two arguments are made. First, China's area studies and world geography are shaped by not only their milieus, but also the ‘milieu of milieus’ as defined and delimited by the state‐disciplinary apparatus which impedes a geography–area studies interface. Second, both milieus are underpinned by reductive epistemologies, engendering depolitised discourses that omit critical self‐reflections and other geographies of knowing. As well as offering insights for China's ongoing and unfinished ‘world‐writing’, this paper draws particular attention to the geographical scales and spatialities of knowledge translation, consumption, circulation and reproduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.70027
Citations
3
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global China's spatial ambition and area studies with geography

Han Cheng
3 citations
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
25.57
article

Global China's spatial ambition and area studies with geography

Han Cheng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper critically evaluates the contemporary remaking of China's area studies and world geography as part of a nationalist project of spatial knowledge production, by examining an emerging landscape of individuals, institutions and ideologies. Two arguments are made. First, China's area studies and world geography are shaped by not only their milieus, but also the ‘milieu of milieus’ as defined and delimited by the state‐disciplinary apparatus which impedes a geography–area studies interface. Second, both milieus are underpinned by reductive epistemologies, engendering depolitised discourses that omit critical self‐reflections and other geographies of knowing. As well as offering insights for China's ongoing and unfinished ‘world‐writing’, this paper draws particular attention to the geographical scales and spatialities of knowledge translation, consumption, circulation and reproduction.

Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersVol. 50(4)
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.