Enhancing Software Usability Through LLMs: A Prompting and Fine-Tuning Framework for Analyzing Negative User Feedback

In today’s competitive digital landscape, application usability plays a critical role in user satisfaction and retention. Negative user reviews offer valuable insights into real-world usability issues, yet traditional analysis methods often fall short in scalability and contextual understanding. This paper proposes an intelligent framework that utilizes large language models (LLMs), including GPT-4, Gemini, and BLOOM, to automate the extraction of actionable usability recommendations from negative app reviews. By applying prompting and fine-tuning techniques, the framework transforms unstructured feedback into meaningful suggestions aligned with three core usability dimensions: correctness, completeness, and satisfaction. A manually annotated dataset of Instagram negative reviews was used to evaluate model performance. Results show that GPT-4 consistently outperformed other models, achieving BLEU scores up to 0.64, ROUGE scores up to 0.80, and METEOR scores up to 0.90—demonstrating high semantic accuracy and contextual relevance in generated recommendations. Gemini and BLOOM, while improved through fine-tuning, showed significantly lower performance. This study also introduces a practical, web-based tool that enables real-time review analysis and recommendation generation, supporting data-driven, user-centered software development. These findings illustrate the potential of LLM-based frameworks to enhance software usability analysis and accelerate feedback-driven design processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14090363
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Software Usability Through LLMs: A Prompting and Fine-Tuning Framework for Analyzing Negative User Feedback

Nahed Alowidi, Nahed Alsaleh, Reem Alnanih
Computers
Software Engineering Research
article

Enhancing Software Usability Through LLMs: A Prompting and Fine-Tuning Framework for Analyzing Negative User Feedback

Nahed Alowidi, Nahed Alsaleh, Reem Alnanih
article en

Abstract

In today’s competitive digital landscape, application usability plays a critical role in user satisfaction and retention. Negative user reviews offer valuable insights into real-world usability issues, yet traditional analysis methods often fall short in scalability and contextual understanding. This paper proposes an intelligent framework that utilizes large language models (LLMs), including GPT-4, Gemini, and BLOOM, to automate the extraction of actionable usability recommendations from negative app reviews. By applying prompting and fine-tuning techniques, the framework transforms unstructured feedback into meaningful suggestions aligned with three core usability dimensions: correctness, completeness, and satisfaction. A manually annotated dataset of Instagram negative reviews was used to evaluate model performance. Results show that GPT-4 consistently outperformed other models, achieving BLEU scores up to 0.64, ROUGE scores up to 0.80, and METEOR scores up to 0.90—demonstrating high semantic accuracy and contextual relevance in generated recommendations. Gemini and BLOOM, while improved through fine-tuning, showed significantly lower performance. This study also introduces a practical, web-based tool that enables real-time review analysis and recommendation generation, supporting data-driven, user-centered software development. These findings illustrate the potential of LLM-based frameworks to enhance software usability analysis and accelerate feedback-driven design processes.

ComputersVol. 14(9)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), University of Ha'il (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.