The applicability of 3D effects to pseudo-static design acceptance criteria: The recovery design for Wall 375
The legislated use of pseudo-static analysis in many jurisdictions mandates its continued application by practitioners. This paper offers guidance to slope stability practitioners on the use the method’s three-dimensional formulation to meet Design Acceptance Criteria. The paper demonstrates that three-dimensional seismic k-coefficients cannot be used as 1:1 substitutes to meet historically established DAC and presents a case for developing the correct equivalencies. The case study of the recovery design along Wall 375 along New Zealand’s State Highway No. 1 in the aftermath of the Kaikoura earthquake is used for illustrative purposes.
Authors
- Julian Venter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5456-8319)
- Jeeva Subramaniam Kumar
- John Read
- Elena Zabolotnii (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5887-8623)
- Tarik Dirikolu
Institutions
- Carleton College (US)
- PEL Associates (United States) (US)
- AngloGold Ashanti (South Africa) (ZA)
- Carleton University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
- Published
- 2025-09-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1702
- Primary Topic
- 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada