Figure 3 from Dietary Fiber Lacks a Consistent Effect on Immune Checkpoint Blockade Efficacy Across Diverse Murine Tumor Models

<p>Grain-based chow favors ICB efficacy in MC-38 allografts, independently of dietary fiber. <b>A,</b> Study design for transplantable tumor models shown in <a href="#fig3" target="_blank">Fig. 3</a> and <a href="#fig4" target="_blank">4</a>. The first two MC-38 experiments (<b>B–E</b>) did not include a purified high-fiber dietary arm. Chow is intrinsically high fiber. <b>B</b> and <b>C,</b> Mean tumor volumes and fraction of mice free of tumors larger than 700 mm<sup>3</sup> in mice implanted with subcutaneous MC-38 tumors, fed with chow or a low–fiber-purified diet, and treated with anti–PD-1 or isotype control in a study performed in CRL facilities. <i>n</i> = 8 for isotype control and <i>n</i> = 12 for anti–PD-1 groups. <b>D</b> and <b>E,</b> Same as in <b>B</b> and <b>C</b> but in a study performed in PU facilities. <i>n</i> = 10. <b>F</b> and <b>G,</b> Same as in <b>B</b> and <b>C</b> for mice fed with chow or purified diets with low or high insoluble fiber (cellulose, LC, or HC, respectively) and low or high soluble fiber (inulin). <i>n</i> = 10. *, <i>P</i> < 0.05; **, <i>P</i> < 0.01; ***, <i>P</i> < 0.001; ****, <i>P</i> < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA with the Tukey <i>post hoc</i> test at endpoint (day 38 for <b>F</b>) for <b>B</b>, <b>D</b>,<b> </b>and<b> F </b>and<b></b>log-rank test for <b>C</b>, <b>E</b>, and <b>G</b>. Values are mean ± SEM. (<b>A,</b> Created with <a href="http://sciencefigures.org" target="_blank">sciencefigures.org</a>.)</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.30029899
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Figure 3 from Dietary Fiber Lacks a Consistent Effect on Immune Checkpoint Blockade Efficacy Across Diverse Murine Tumor Models

Zihong Chen, Eric G. Pamer, Asael Roichman, Victoria Burgo et al.
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Figure 3 from Dietary Fiber Lacks a Consistent Effect on Immune Checkpoint Blockade Efficacy Across Diverse Murine Tumor Models

Zihong Chen, Eric G. Pamer, Asael Roichman, Victoria Burgo, Yibin Kang, Michael R. MacArthur, Joshua D. Rabinowitz, Yong Wei, Akshada Sawant, Ziqing Chen, Gabriela Reyes‐Castellanos, Eileen White, Sarah J. Mitchell, Beianka Tomlinson, Xincheng Xu, Maria Gomez-Jenkins, Jesse R. Powers, Xiang Hang, Maria Ibrahim, Llewelyn Levett
article en

Abstract

<p>Grain-based chow favors ICB efficacy in MC-38 allografts, independently of dietary fiber. <b>A,</b> Study design for transplantable tumor models shown in <a href="#fig3" target="_blank">Fig. 3</a> and <a href="#fig4" target="_blank">4</a>. The first two MC-38 experiments (<b>B–E</b>) did not include a purified high-fiber dietary arm. Chow is intrinsically high fiber. <b>B</b> and <b>C,</b> Mean tumor volumes and fraction of mice free of tumors larger than 700 mm<sup>3</sup> in mice implanted with subcutaneous MC-38 tumors, fed with chow or a low–fiber-purified diet, and treated with anti–PD-1 or isotype control in a study performed in CRL facilities. <i>n</i> = 8 for isotype control and <i>n</i> = 12 for anti–PD-1 groups. <b>D</b> and <b>E,</b> Same as in <b>B</b> and <b>C</b> but in a study performed in PU facilities. <i>n</i> = 10. <b>F</b> and <b>G,</b> Same as in <b>B</b> and <b>C</b> for mice fed with chow or purified diets with low or high insoluble fiber (cellulose, LC, or HC, respectively) and low or high soluble fiber (inulin). <i>n</i> = 10. *, <i>P</i> < 0.05; **, <i>P</i> < 0.01; ***, <i>P</i> < 0.001; ****, <i>P</i> < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA with the Tukey <i>post hoc</i> test at endpoint (day 38 for <b>F</b>) for <b>B</b>, <b>D</b>,<b> </b>and<b> F </b>and<b></b>log-rank test for <b>C</b>, <b>E</b>, and <b>G</b>. Values are mean ± SEM. (<b>A,</b> Created with <a href="http://sciencefigures.org" target="_blank">sciencefigures.org</a>.)</p>

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.