Figure 1 from Dietary Fiber Lacks a Consistent Effect on Immune Checkpoint Blockade Efficacy Across Diverse Murine Tumor Models

<p>Microbiome composition is primarily shaped by diet type and is partially restored to chow-like levels by isolated fiber. <b>A,</b> Macronutrient and fiber composition of diets used in this study represented by %gram. In each tumor experiment, we used one of the low cellulose (LC)–purified diets (low fiber) and up to four of the high cellulose (HC)–purified diets (high fiber). LC = 2.5 to 2.6 %gram and HC = 14.9 to 15.7 %gram. Numbers in diet names represent %gram of inulin (In) in the diets. <b>B,</b> Schematic of the study design for the metagenomics (this figure) and metabolomics (<a href="#fig2" target="_blank">Fig. 2</a>). <b>C,</b> Principal coordinate analysis of all metagenomic samples from the B16-OVA experiment. PC, principal component. <b>D,</b> Shannon α diversity index across the dietary groups. Boxes represent the IQR with median shown as a horizontal line, whiskers extend from minimum to maximum values, and different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05) by a one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey <i>post hoc</i> test. <b>E,</b> Relative abundances of microbiome composition at the phylum level, shown as the mean for each group. <b>F,</b> Heatmap depicting the relative abundances of 314 taxa after filtering out low-abundance taxa (<30 counts in >85% of samples). <b>G,</b> Venn diagram of significantly changed taxa in mice fed with chow vs. low–fiber-purified diet (LC_In0) and in mice fed with high–fiber (HC_In8)- vs. low–fiber (LC_In0)-purified diet (all B16-OVA tumors and anti–PD-1 treatment). <b>H,</b> Scatter plot of the 81 taxa altered by both chow and high-fiber–purified diet, displaying correlations between these two conditions. Each dot represents a specific taxon, with dot color indicating the taxon’s phylum as specified in the legend. For <b>C</b>–<b>H</b>, data are from <i>n</i> = 5 to 7 mice per group. FC, fold change. (<b>B,</b> Created with <a href="http://sciencefigures.org" target="_blank">sciencefigures.org</a>.)</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.30029905
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Figure 1 from Dietary Fiber Lacks a Consistent Effect on Immune Checkpoint Blockade Efficacy Across Diverse Murine Tumor Models

Zihong Chen, Eric G. Pamer, Asael Roichman, Victoria Burgo et al.
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Figure 1 from Dietary Fiber Lacks a Consistent Effect on Immune Checkpoint Blockade Efficacy Across Diverse Murine Tumor Models

Zihong Chen, Eric G. Pamer, Asael Roichman, Victoria Burgo, Yibin Kang, Michael R. MacArthur, Joshua D. Rabinowitz, Yong Wei, Akshada Sawant, Ziqing Chen, Gabriela Reyes‐Castellanos, Eileen White, Sarah J. Mitchell, Beianka Tomlinson, Xincheng Xu, Maria Gomez-Jenkins, Jesse R. Powers, Xiang Hang, Maria Ibrahim, Llewelyn Levett
article en

Abstract

<p>Microbiome composition is primarily shaped by diet type and is partially restored to chow-like levels by isolated fiber. <b>A,</b> Macronutrient and fiber composition of diets used in this study represented by %gram. In each tumor experiment, we used one of the low cellulose (LC)–purified diets (low fiber) and up to four of the high cellulose (HC)–purified diets (high fiber). LC = 2.5 to 2.6 %gram and HC = 14.9 to 15.7 %gram. Numbers in diet names represent %gram of inulin (In) in the diets. <b>B,</b> Schematic of the study design for the metagenomics (this figure) and metabolomics (<a href="#fig2" target="_blank">Fig. 2</a>). <b>C,</b> Principal coordinate analysis of all metagenomic samples from the B16-OVA experiment. PC, principal component. <b>D,</b> Shannon α diversity index across the dietary groups. Boxes represent the IQR with median shown as a horizontal line, whiskers extend from minimum to maximum values, and different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05) by a one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey <i>post hoc</i> test. <b>E,</b> Relative abundances of microbiome composition at the phylum level, shown as the mean for each group. <b>F,</b> Heatmap depicting the relative abundances of 314 taxa after filtering out low-abundance taxa (<30 counts in >85% of samples). <b>G,</b> Venn diagram of significantly changed taxa in mice fed with chow vs. low–fiber-purified diet (LC_In0) and in mice fed with high–fiber (HC_In8)- vs. low–fiber (LC_In0)-purified diet (all B16-OVA tumors and anti–PD-1 treatment). <b>H,</b> Scatter plot of the 81 taxa altered by both chow and high-fiber–purified diet, displaying correlations between these two conditions. Each dot represents a specific taxon, with dot color indicating the taxon’s phylum as specified in the legend. For <b>C</b>–<b>H</b>, data are from <i>n</i> = 5 to 7 mice per group. FC, fold change. (<b>B,</b> Created with <a href="http://sciencefigures.org" target="_blank">sciencefigures.org</a>.)</p>

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.