Relationship between Performance Measures and Social Network Analysis Measures in Academic Co-Authorship Networks: Insights Occupational Positive Mental Health and Flourishing

This research aims to analyze the correlation between performance measures and social network analysis in Occupational Positive Mental Health (OPMH) and Flourishing (FL) studies, assessing their global impact in recent decades. The methodology implemented was based on bibliometric analysis, using queries in Web of Science and Scopus databases, adapting the PRISMA methodology for data processing flow, employing bibliometric techniques, web scraping through Crossref, and employing descriptive, correlation, and regression analysis with Omnibus test and likelihood ratio test to measure significance levels. A total of 558 studies (WoS= 268) and (Scopus= 290) were processed, resulting in a total of (n=375) studies. The results reveal that among the collaboration networks, there were Nodes (N= 17,260) and Links (E= 94,772), while citation networks showed Nodes (N= 555) and Links (E= 1,151). Furthermore, a high correlation was found between the variables examined (structural holes, link strength, and quality) and the impact of research conducted in recent years in the fields of OPMH and FL. In conclusion, performance measures and collaborative social network analysis are correlated, enhancing understanding of unstructured information in mental health and other domains. Researchers with strong collaborative and multidisciplinary networks can enhance their impact by producing high-quality research, particularly in innovative areas like OPMH and FL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientometric Research
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.20251071
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship between Performance Measures and Social Network Analysis Measures in Academic Co-Authorship Networks: Insights Occupational Positive Mental Health and Flourishing

Carlos Andrés Trejos-Gil, Carlos Andres Toro, Maria Victoria Restrepo Tobon
1 links
Journal of Scientometric Research
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Relationship between Performance Measures and Social Network Analysis Measures in Academic Co-Authorship Networks: Insights Occupational Positive Mental Health and Flourishing

Carlos Andrés Trejos-Gil, Carlos Andres Toro, Maria Victoria Restrepo Tobon
article en

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the correlation between performance measures and social network analysis in Occupational Positive Mental Health (OPMH) and Flourishing (FL) studies, assessing their global impact in recent decades. The methodology implemented was based on bibliometric analysis, using queries in Web of Science and Scopus databases, adapting the PRISMA methodology for data processing flow, employing bibliometric techniques, web scraping through Crossref, and employing descriptive, correlation, and regression analysis with Omnibus test and likelihood ratio test to measure significance levels. A total of 558 studies (WoS= 268) and (Scopus= 290) were processed, resulting in a total of (n=375) studies. The results reveal that among the collaboration networks, there were Nodes (N= 17,260) and Links (E= 94,772), while citation networks showed Nodes (N= 555) and Links (E= 1,151). Furthermore, a high correlation was found between the variables examined (structural holes, link strength, and quality) and the impact of research conducted in recent years in the fields of OPMH and FL. In conclusion, performance measures and collaborative social network analysis are correlated, enhancing understanding of unstructured information in mental health and other domains. Researchers with strong collaborative and multidisciplinary networks can enhance their impact by producing high-quality research, particularly in innovative areas like OPMH and FL.

Journal of Scientometric ResearchVol. 14(2)
Instituto de Neurologia Y Neurocirugia (CU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.