Utilizing Generative AI to Counter Learner Groupthink by Introducing Controversy in Collaborative Problem-Based Learning Settings

This article highlights the foundational challenge of rapid interprofessional student team formation and the potential challenges that groupthink poses for newly-formed teams participating in collaborative problem-based learning activities. This article describes a mixed-methods study that addresses groupthink by introducing a generative artificial intelligence-based agent (genAI agent) into the small group processes of student teams engaging in a session of a well-established virtual interprofessional education methodology. The integration of this novel genAI tool into each student team was an intentional pedagogical technique, introduced in response to the challenges that newly-formed student teams may encounter as they rapidly come together and potentially contend with the many factors that may contribute to a state of groupthink. This study’s findings regarding: student perceptions of the GenAI agent; its integration into their team processes; its influence on team discussion and outcomes; the influence of faculty facilitators on acceptance of the genAI agent; and findings regarding the introduction of controversial viewpoints by a genAI agent as a mechanism to counter groupthink, are reported and discussed alongside recommendations for further research and utilization of this instructional approach. Keywords: Generative AI Agents, Artificial Intelligence in Education, Team Based Learning, Problem Based Learning, Groupthink, Controversy, Learner Collaboration, Team Dynamics, Psychological Safety, Interprofessional Education, Health Professions Education

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Online Learning
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i3.5096
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilizing Generative AI to Counter Learner Groupthink by Introducing Controversy in Collaborative Problem-Based Learning Settings

Elke Zschaebitz, Andrew Wiss, Mary Showstark, Dawn Joosten‐Hagye et al.
1 citations
Online Learning
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
article

Utilizing Generative AI to Counter Learner Groupthink by Introducing Controversy in Collaborative Problem-Based Learning Settings

Elke Zschaebitz, Andrew Wiss, Mary Showstark, Dawn Joosten‐Hagye, Erin Embry, Kirsten Potter, Jennifer Pattershall-Geide, Kyle Dobbeck
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article highlights the foundational challenge of rapid interprofessional student team formation and the potential challenges that groupthink poses for newly-formed teams participating in collaborative problem-based learning activities. This article describes a mixed-methods study that addresses groupthink by introducing a generative artificial intelligence-based agent (genAI agent) into the small group processes of student teams engaging in a session of a well-established virtual interprofessional education methodology. The integration of this novel genAI tool into each student team was an intentional pedagogical technique, introduced in response to the challenges that newly-formed student teams may encounter as they rapidly come together and potentially contend with the many factors that may contribute to a state of groupthink. This study’s findings regarding: student perceptions of the GenAI agent; its integration into their team processes; its influence on team discussion and outcomes; the influence of faculty facilitators on acceptance of the genAI agent; and findings regarding the introduction of controversial viewpoints by a genAI agent as a mechanism to counter groupthink, are reported and discussed alongside recommendations for further research and utilization of this instructional approach. Keywords: Generative AI Agents, Artificial Intelligence in Education, Team Based Learning, Problem Based Learning, Groupthink, Controversy, Learner Collaboration, Team Dynamics, Psychological Safety, Interprofessional Education, Health Professions Education

Online LearningVol. 29(3)
University of Southern California (US), Tufts University (US), Milken Institute (US), Montclair State University (US), Georgetown University (US), George Washington University (US), California Southern University (US), Yale University (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.