Teacher Professional Development in Vocational Education: A Comparative Study between China and Malaysia

This study investigates teacher professional development (TPD) in vocational education through a comparative analysis of China and Malaysia.Drawing on policy documents, theoretical frameworks, and empirical findings, the research compares TPD practices across four dimensions: policy foundation, industry engagement, training content, and career pathways.The results show that China emphasizes a policy-driven "dual-qualified" teacher model supported by structured government initiatives, while Malaysia highlights teacher autonomy and industry-led mechanisms such as certification systems, professional learning communities, and workplace learning.Despite these differences, both systems face similar challenges, including uneven regional participation and limited enterprise involvement.The study concludes that combining China's systematic planning with Malaysia's flexible, industryintegrated approaches could yield more effective and sustainable TPD models.It further suggests enhancing cross-country collaboration through joint programs, digital platforms, and mutual recognition of qualifications to strengthen vocational education systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v14-i3/26313
Primary Topic
Education and Vocational Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teacher Professional Development in Vocational Education: A Comparative Study between China and Malaysia

Khairul Azhar Jamaludin, Geng Yan
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Education and Vocational Training
article

Teacher Professional Development in Vocational Education: A Comparative Study between China and Malaysia

Khairul Azhar Jamaludin, Geng Yan
article en

Abstract

This study investigates teacher professional development (TPD) in vocational education through a comparative analysis of China and Malaysia.Drawing on policy documents, theoretical frameworks, and empirical findings, the research compares TPD practices across four dimensions: policy foundation, industry engagement, training content, and career pathways.The results show that China emphasizes a policy-driven "dual-qualified" teacher model supported by structured government initiatives, while Malaysia highlights teacher autonomy and industry-led mechanisms such as certification systems, professional learning communities, and workplace learning.Despite these differences, both systems face similar challenges, including uneven regional participation and limited enterprise involvement.The study concludes that combining China's systematic planning with Malaysia's flexible, industryintegrated approaches could yield more effective and sustainable TPD models.It further suggests enhancing cross-country collaboration through joint programs, digital platforms, and mutual recognition of qualifications to strengthen vocational education systems.

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and DevelopmentVol. 14(3)
National Defence University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Education and Vocational Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teacher Professional Development in Vocational Education: A Comparative Study between China and Malaysia — Khairul Azhar Jamaludin, Geng Yan · International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS