How do neoliberals vote? Power‐based asymmetries in hierarchy‐enhancement

Abstract Neoliberal ideology has received increasing empirical attention in recent years, although little is known about its relationship to voting behavior. Examining this question may offer insight into theoretical questions regarding social hierarchies and neoliberalism. Following from social dominance theory, we posit that social dominance orientation should predict neoliberal ideology, which should, in turn, predict voting for a Republican candidate. However, building from the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, we posit that these relationships should be stronger among high (vs. low) power groups. One study ( N = 604) is designed to test these hypothesized relationships between social dominance orientation, neoliberal ideology, and voting intentions among high‐ and low‐power groups using a series of moderated‐mediation models in the context of the 2024 US Presidential election. A nationally representative sample (based on race, gender, age, and political affiliation) of registered voters was recruited from Prolific to complete a brief survey in the weeks leading up to the election.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70029
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do neoliberals vote? Power‐based asymmetries in hierarchy‐enhancement

Tyler Jimenez, Harrison J. Schmitt, T. A. Martin
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Gender Politics and Representation
article

How do neoliberals vote? Power‐based asymmetries in hierarchy‐enhancement

Tyler Jimenez, Harrison J. Schmitt, T. A. Martin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Neoliberal ideology has received increasing empirical attention in recent years, although little is known about its relationship to voting behavior. Examining this question may offer insight into theoretical questions regarding social hierarchies and neoliberalism. Following from social dominance theory, we posit that social dominance orientation should predict neoliberal ideology, which should, in turn, predict voting for a Republican candidate. However, building from the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, we posit that these relationships should be stronger among high (vs. low) power groups. One study ( N = 604) is designed to test these hypothesized relationships between social dominance orientation, neoliberal ideology, and voting intentions among high‐ and low‐power groups using a series of moderated‐mediation models in the context of the 2024 US Presidential election. A nationally representative sample (based on race, gender, age, and political affiliation) of registered voters was recruited from Prolific to complete a brief survey in the weeks leading up to the election.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 25(3)
University of Arizona (US), Skidmore College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.