A Comparative Analysis of China’s Anthropogenic CO <sub>2</sub> Emissions (2000–2023): Insights from Six Bottom-Up Inventories and Uncertainty Assessment

Abstract. Accurate quantification of anthropogenic CO2 emissions is crucial for mitigating climate change and verifying emission reduction policies. This study conducts a comparative analysis of China’s anthropogenic CO2 emissions for the period between 2000 and 2023 based on six widely used bottom-up inventories at their latest version (ODIAC2023, EDGAR2024, MEIC-global-CO2 v1.0, CAMS-GLOB-ANT v6.2, GEMS v1.0, and CEADs). The national total CO2 emissions increase from 3.43 (3.21–3.63) Gt year-1 in 2000 to 12.03 (11.35–12.98) Gt year-1 in 2023, with three growth periods: rapid growth (2000–2012, 0.56±0.015 Gt year-1), near-stagnation (2012–2016, 0.01±0.045 Gt year-1), and renewed growth (2016–2023, 0.30±0.016 Gt year-1). Emissions are dominated by the electricity and heat production, and the industry and construction (78 % of total emissions), with the former replacing the latter as the largest source after 2017. EDGAR consistently reports the highest national CO2 emissions, while MEIC provides the lowest, contributing to the large deviations after 2012. EDGAR and MEIC report different spatial distributions of the transport sector. EDGAR concentrates emissions along major roads and MEIC distributes them more diffusely. Extreme outliers (&gt;105 ton CO2 km-2 year-1, against an average of 102 ton CO2 km-2 year-1) in these inventories arise from discrepancies in point source data in the Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA) versus the China Power Emissions Database (CPED). Overall, the uncertainty of total national anthropogenic CO2 emissions is within 5 % (1σ), and the uncertainties are about 10–50 % (1σ) at the provincial level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3914
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of China’s Anthropogenic CO 2 Emissions (2000–2023): Insights from Six Bottom-Up Inventories and Uncertainty Assessment

Minqiang Zhou, Greet Janssens‐Maenhout, Diego Guizzardi, Huirong Yang et al.
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

A Comparative Analysis of China’s Anthropogenic CO 2 Emissions (2000–2023): Insights from Six Bottom-Up Inventories and Uncertainty Assessment

Minqiang Zhou, Greet Janssens‐Maenhout, Diego Guizzardi, Huirong Yang, Huizhong Shen, Monica Crippa, Kai Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate quantification of anthropogenic CO2 emissions is crucial for mitigating climate change and verifying emission reduction policies. This study conducts a comparative analysis of China’s anthropogenic CO2 emissions for the period between 2000 and 2023 based on six widely used bottom-up inventories at their latest version (ODIAC2023, EDGAR2024, MEIC-global-CO2 v1.0, CAMS-GLOB-ANT v6.2, GEMS v1.0, and CEADs). The national total CO2 emissions increase from 3.43 (3.21–3.63) Gt year-1 in 2000 to 12.03 (11.35–12.98) Gt year-1 in 2023, with three growth periods: rapid growth (2000–2012, 0.56±0.015 Gt year-1), near-stagnation (2012–2016, 0.01±0.045 Gt year-1), and renewed growth (2016–2023, 0.30±0.016 Gt year-1). Emissions are dominated by the electricity and heat production, and the industry and construction (78 % of total emissions), with the former replacing the latter as the largest source after 2017. EDGAR consistently reports the highest national CO2 emissions, while MEIC provides the lowest, contributing to the large deviations after 2012. EDGAR and MEIC report different spatial distributions of the transport sector. EDGAR concentrates emissions along major roads and MEIC distributes them more diffusely. Extreme outliers (&gt;105 ton CO2 km-2 year-1, against an average of 102 ton CO2 km-2 year-1) in these inventories arise from discrepancies in point source data in the Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA) versus the China Power Emissions Database (CPED). Overall, the uncertainty of total national anthropogenic CO2 emissions is within 5 % (1σ), and the uncertainties are about 10–50 % (1σ) at the provincial level.

Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), European Commission (BE), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
European Commission, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tsinghua University, Peking University, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Joint Research Centre, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.