AI-Driven Grading and Moderation for Collaborative Projects in Computer Science Education

Collaborative group projects are integral to computer science education, fostering teamwork, problem-solving, and industry-relevant skills. However, assessing individual contributions within group settings is a long-standing challenge. Traditional assessment strategies, such as equal distribution of grades or subjective peer assessments, fall short in terms of fairness, objectivity, and scalability, especially in large classrooms. This paper introduces a semi-automated, AI-assisted grading system that evaluates both project quality and individual effort using repository mining, communication analytics, and machine learning models. The system comprises modules for project evaluation, contribution analysis, and grade computation, integrating seamlessly with platforms like GitHub. A pilot deployment in a senior-level course demonstrated high alignment with instructor assessments, increased student satisfaction, and reduced instructor grading effort. We conclude by discussing implementation considerations, ethical implications, and proposed enhancements to broaden applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54808/imsci2025.01.6
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Grading and Moderation for Collaborative Projects in Computer Science Education

Songmei Yu, Andrew Zagula
Proceedings
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

AI-Driven Grading and Moderation for Collaborative Projects in Computer Science Education

Songmei Yu, Andrew Zagula
article en

Abstract

Collaborative group projects are integral to computer science education, fostering teamwork, problem-solving, and industry-relevant skills. However, assessing individual contributions within group settings is a long-standing challenge. Traditional assessment strategies, such as equal distribution of grades or subjective peer assessments, fall short in terms of fairness, objectivity, and scalability, especially in large classrooms. This paper introduces a semi-automated, AI-assisted grading system that evaluates both project quality and individual effort using repository mining, communication analytics, and machine learning models. The system comprises modules for project evaluation, contribution analysis, and grade computation, integrating seamlessly with platforms like GitHub. A pilot deployment in a senior-level course demonstrated high alignment with instructor assessments, increased student satisfaction, and reduced instructor grading effort. We conclude by discussing implementation considerations, ethical implications, and proposed enhancements to broaden applicability.

ProceedingsVol. 23(5)
Bridgewater College (US), Felician University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.