Latent profile analysis for benefit finding in ischemic stroke patients: A cross-sectional study

This study aims to explore the benefit finding (BF) profile and to identify heterogeneous subgroups in patients with ischemic stroke. From November 2021 to July 2022, the cross-sectional study was carried out among patients with ischemic stroke using a convenient sampling. The general information questionnaire, modified Rankin Scale, revised Benefit Finding Scale, and Mutuality Scale were used for the investigation. Latent Profile Analysis was utilized to examine benefit finding profiles of ischemic stroke patients, and multiple logistic regression analysis was implemented to assess the impact of various factors on distinct profiles. A total of 241 ischemic stroke patients were enrolled in this survey. Respondents were divided into three benefit finding subgroups: low benefit finding-unacceptable group (N = 131, 54.4 %), moderate benefit finding-perceived support group (N = 89, 36.9 %), and high benefit finding-personal growth group (N = 21, 8.7 %). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR = 1.130, 95 %CI: 1.062-1.203, P<0.001), monthly income (OR = 0.203, 95 %CI: 0.060-0.686, P = 0.010), and mutuality scores (OR = 1.090, 95 %CI: 1.028-1.156, P = 0.004) were positively associated with BF, and religious belief (OR = 0.112, 95 %CI: 0.018-0.715, P = 0.021) was associated with higher BF. Significant differences exist in the classification characteristics of benefit finding among ischemic stroke patients. Medical practitioners ought to evaluate the diverse traits of benefit finding in stroke patients and adopt specific psychological intervention strategies for its enhancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105500
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Latent profile analysis for benefit finding in ischemic stroke patients: A cross-sectional study

Danfeng Wang, Hui Li, Jing Chen, Jie Zhang et al.
Acta Psychologica
Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
article

Latent profile analysis for benefit finding in ischemic stroke patients: A cross-sectional study

Danfeng Wang, Hui Li, Jing Chen, Jie Zhang, Yalin Zhang, An Jia, Zhenxiang Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study aims to explore the benefit finding (BF) profile and to identify heterogeneous subgroups in patients with ischemic stroke. From November 2021 to July 2022, the cross-sectional study was carried out among patients with ischemic stroke using a convenient sampling. The general information questionnaire, modified Rankin Scale, revised Benefit Finding Scale, and Mutuality Scale were used for the investigation. Latent Profile Analysis was utilized to examine benefit finding profiles of ischemic stroke patients, and multiple logistic regression analysis was implemented to assess the impact of various factors on distinct profiles. A total of 241 ischemic stroke patients were enrolled in this survey. Respondents were divided into three benefit finding subgroups: low benefit finding-unacceptable group (N = 131, 54.4 %), moderate benefit finding-perceived support group (N = 89, 36.9 %), and high benefit finding-personal growth group (N = 21, 8.7 %). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR = 1.130, 95 %CI: 1.062-1.203, P<0.001), monthly income (OR = 0.203, 95 %CI: 0.060-0.686, P = 0.010), and mutuality scores (OR = 1.090, 95 %CI: 1.028-1.156, P = 0.004) were positively associated with BF, and religious belief (OR = 0.112, 95 %CI: 0.018-0.715, P = 0.021) was associated with higher BF. Significant differences exist in the classification characteristics of benefit finding among ischemic stroke patients. Medical practitioners ought to evaluate the diverse traits of benefit finding in stroke patients and adopt specific psychological intervention strategies for its enhancement.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 260
Zhengzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.