Comparative Performance Analysis of Smart Passive Optical (SPO) and Router-Based Transmission in Fiber Networks

This paper offers an in-depth comparative study between Smart Passive Optical (SPO) Layer 2 transmission and traditional router-based Layer 3 transmission in fibre optic networks. The analysis evaluates throughput, latency, efficiency, energy consumption, packet loss, jitter, cost per Gbps, and cybersecurity exposure across varying traffic loads. Simulation results show that, in local and access-level networks, SPO consistently delivers higher data rates, reduced latency, and improved energy efficiency compared to routers. The findings highlight the suitability of SPO for latency-sensitive, cost-efficient, and scalable optical communication systems due to its low protocol overhead and passive distribution, whereas the router model incorporates routing table lookups and buffering logic, offering advantages in scalability and flexibility for long-haul and complex routing environments. The study proposes a hybrid architecture that combines Smart Passive Optical (SPO) Layer 2 switching with conventional Layer 3 router-based systems to maximise the capabilities of both transmission technologies and provide new opportunities for transmission engineers.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14445/23488549/ijece-v12i8p109
Primary Topic
Optical Network Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance Analysis of Smart Passive Optical (SPO) and Router-Based Transmission in Fiber Networks

International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering
Optical Network Technologies
article

Comparative Performance Analysis of Smart Passive Optical (SPO) and Router-Based Transmission in Fiber Networks

article en

Abstract

This paper offers an in-depth comparative study between Smart Passive Optical (SPO) Layer 2 transmission and traditional router-based Layer 3 transmission in fibre optic networks. The analysis evaluates throughput, latency, efficiency, energy consumption, packet loss, jitter, cost per Gbps, and cybersecurity exposure across varying traffic loads. Simulation results show that, in local and access-level networks, SPO consistently delivers higher data rates, reduced latency, and improved energy efficiency compared to routers. The findings highlight the suitability of SPO for latency-sensitive, cost-efficient, and scalable optical communication systems due to its low protocol overhead and passive distribution, whereas the router model incorporates routing table lookups and buffering logic, offering advantages in scalability and flexibility for long-haul and complex routing environments. The study proposes a hybrid architecture that combines Smart Passive Optical (SPO) Layer 2 switching with conventional Layer 3 router-based systems to maximise the capabilities of both transmission technologies and provide new opportunities for transmission engineers.

International Journal of Electronics and Communication EngineeringVol. 12(8)
Sohar University
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Optical Network Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Performance Analysis of Smart Passive Optical (SPO) and Router-Based Transmission in Fiber Networks · International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS