Trade‐Off Between Hydraulic Performance and Filtration Level of Screen Filters Under Different Inlet Pressures and Screen Apertures

ABSTRACT Screen filters (SFs) are widely used for water purification. Particles adhered to the SF surface can block flow channels and potentially result in changes in the SF filtration level. However, the impact of blockage on the actual filtration level and hydraulic performance of SF remains uncertain. This study investigated the effects of five inlet pressures (0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 and 0.10 MPa) and seven screen apertures (125, 150, 180, 210, 250, 300 and 355 μm) on the filtration effectiveness, head loss and flow rate of agricultural SF. The results revealed that blockage reduced the SF pore size by 16%–45%, increasing the filtration level. An increased inlet pressure accelerated SF blockage and increased the filtration level, reducing the pore size by 14%–35% at 0.10 MPa, compared with 0.02 MPa. However, an improved filtration level led to greater head loss. A trade‐off between screen aperture and head loss was identified, suggesting the need for practical SF filtration level adjustments. For the 210 μm filtration requirement, the use of a 250 μm filter at 0.06 MPa or a 300 μm filter at 0.08 MPa achieved the desired aperture while minimizing head loss. Compared with selecting filters solely on the basis of pore size, adjusting the filtration level increased the average flow rate by 23% and decreased the average head loss by 25%. This study provides significant insights into SF filtration grade changes and offers a strategy to reduce filtration energy consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irrigation and Drainage
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.70014
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade‐Off Between Hydraulic Performance and Filtration Level of Screen Filters Under Different Inlet Pressures and Screen Apertures

Kai Zhang, Jaume Puig–Bargués, Yunkai Li, Liming Yu et al.
Irrigation and Drainage
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
article

Trade‐Off Between Hydraulic Performance and Filtration Level of Screen Filters Under Different Inlet Pressures and Screen Apertures

Kai Zhang, Jaume Puig–Bargués, Yunkai Li, Liming Yu, Peng Hou, Yang Xiao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Screen filters (SFs) are widely used for water purification. Particles adhered to the SF surface can block flow channels and potentially result in changes in the SF filtration level. However, the impact of blockage on the actual filtration level and hydraulic performance of SF remains uncertain. This study investigated the effects of five inlet pressures (0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 and 0.10 MPa) and seven screen apertures (125, 150, 180, 210, 250, 300 and 355 μm) on the filtration effectiveness, head loss and flow rate of agricultural SF. The results revealed that blockage reduced the SF pore size by 16%–45%, increasing the filtration level. An increased inlet pressure accelerated SF blockage and increased the filtration level, reducing the pore size by 14%–35% at 0.10 MPa, compared with 0.02 MPa. However, an improved filtration level led to greater head loss. A trade‐off between screen aperture and head loss was identified, suggesting the need for practical SF filtration level adjustments. For the 210 μm filtration requirement, the use of a 250 μm filter at 0.06 MPa or a 300 μm filter at 0.08 MPa achieved the desired aperture while minimizing head loss. Compared with selecting filters solely on the basis of pore size, adjusting the filtration level increased the average flow rate by 23% and decreased the average head loss by 25%. This study provides significant insights into SF filtration grade changes and offers a strategy to reduce filtration energy consumption.

Irrigation and DrainageVol. 75(1)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Universitat de Girona (ES), China Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.