Uncovering the value orientations behind health concerns driving pro-environmental decisions: The case of pesticide use in agriculture

• None of the hypothesised interactions between risk information and values were found. • Instead, biospheric values were associated with acceptance of fungicide governance. • Personal safety values do not appear to underlie people’s health concerns. • Egoistic values do not appear to underlie people’s health concerns. • We may need another value orientation that reflects people’s health concerns. Pro-environmental decisions, such as rejecting pesticide use in agriculture, may stem from both environmental and health concerns. Identifying which concerns are more decisive for pro-environmental decisions, and whether this varies between people, depending on their value orientations, could offer valuable insights into how to best promote pro-environmental decisions across different audiences. While biospheric values likely underlie environmental concerns, it is unclear which value orientation underlies health concerns. In a preregistered online experiment ( N = 823), we explored whether egoistic or personal safety values—a subtype of personal security values developed for this study—underlie health concerns regarding pesticide use in agriculture. Participants reported on their opposition to the use of a fictitious fungicide in potato cultivation, based on information about its risks to human health (relevant for egoistic and personal safety values) and/or the environment (relevant for biospheric values). Stronger biospheric values were consistently associated with stronger opposition to the fungicide’s use, regardless of the risk information. Egoistic values interacted with risk information, but these interactions contradicted our assumption that egoistic values reflect health concerns. Personal safety values showed no interaction with risk information and were not independently associated to opposition to the fungicide’s use. Our findings suggest that neither egoistic nor personal safety values serve as the basis for health concerns driving pro-environmental decisions. This underscores the need to identify an additional value orientation that reflects health concerns and develop measures to assess it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100240
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering the value orientations behind health concerns driving pro-environmental decisions: The case of pesticide use in agriculture

Elmar Aigner, Nadja Contzen, Andreas Scheidegger, Lothar Aicher et al.
Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Uncovering the value orientations behind health concerns driving pro-environmental decisions: The case of pesticide use in agriculture

Elmar Aigner, Nadja Contzen, Andreas Scheidegger, Lothar Aicher, Martin F. Wilks
article en

Abstract

• None of the hypothesised interactions between risk information and values were found. • Instead, biospheric values were associated with acceptance of fungicide governance. • Personal safety values do not appear to underlie people’s health concerns. • Egoistic values do not appear to underlie people’s health concerns. • We may need another value orientation that reflects people’s health concerns. Pro-environmental decisions, such as rejecting pesticide use in agriculture, may stem from both environmental and health concerns. Identifying which concerns are more decisive for pro-environmental decisions, and whether this varies between people, depending on their value orientations, could offer valuable insights into how to best promote pro-environmental decisions across different audiences. While biospheric values likely underlie environmental concerns, it is unclear which value orientation underlies health concerns. In a preregistered online experiment ( N = 823), we explored whether egoistic or personal safety values—a subtype of personal security values developed for this study—underlie health concerns regarding pesticide use in agriculture. Participants reported on their opposition to the use of a fictitious fungicide in potato cultivation, based on information about its risks to human health (relevant for egoistic and personal safety values) and/or the environment (relevant for biospheric values). Stronger biospheric values were consistently associated with stronger opposition to the fungicide’s use, regardless of the risk information. Egoistic values interacted with risk information, but these interactions contradicted our assumption that egoistic values reflect health concerns. Personal safety values showed no interaction with risk information and were not independently associated to opposition to the fungicide’s use. Our findings suggest that neither egoistic nor personal safety values serve as the basis for health concerns driving pro-environmental decisions. This underscores the need to identify an additional value orientation that reflects health concerns and develop measures to assess it.

Current Research in Ecological and Social PsychologyVol. 9
University of Groningen (NL), University of Basel (CH), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.