Innovation in gifted education coordinators: A sequential transformational mixed methods study

Gifted education coordinators (GECs) are called upon to transform programs in their districts to overcome long-standing racial and socio-economic disparities in identification and services (Ezzani et al., 2021; Floyd, 2022). This is only possible if the gifted coordinator believes themselves to be capable of leading change and persists through the difficulties of implementation. The purpose of this study is to understand how GECs believe they can innovate within their districts and the impact those beliefs have on their patterns of practice, and what other factors contribute to innovative action. The design is a sequential transformational mixed method design with two phases and three distinct points of integration. First, we distributed a survey including scales for innovation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE). Then we plotted the ESE score and innovative depth scores in a scatterplot and purposively sampled participants for phase two interviews from each quadrant. Second, we used the results of the phase one survey to adjust the interview protocol for phase two, and used the qualitative responses of each selected participant in the protocol as anchoring prompts. The final point of integration is in the analysis and meta-question, which includes an integrated data display. We found that leadership experience positively predicted ESE, and ESE positively predicted innovation. Through the transformation and integration of data, descriptions of each quadrant reveal relevant points of interest for preparing and supporting GECs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Psychology
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2025.100200
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation in gifted education coordinators: A sequential transformational mixed methods study

Celeste D. C. Sodergren, Beatrice N. Ruiz
1 citations
Methods in Psychology
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
2.76
article

Innovation in gifted education coordinators: A sequential transformational mixed methods study

Celeste D. C. Sodergren, Beatrice N. Ruiz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gifted education coordinators (GECs) are called upon to transform programs in their districts to overcome long-standing racial and socio-economic disparities in identification and services (Ezzani et al., 2021; Floyd, 2022). This is only possible if the gifted coordinator believes themselves to be capable of leading change and persists through the difficulties of implementation. The purpose of this study is to understand how GECs believe they can innovate within their districts and the impact those beliefs have on their patterns of practice, and what other factors contribute to innovative action. The design is a sequential transformational mixed method design with two phases and three distinct points of integration. First, we distributed a survey including scales for innovation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE). Then we plotted the ESE score and innovative depth scores in a scatterplot and purposively sampled participants for phase two interviews from each quadrant. Second, we used the results of the phase one survey to adjust the interview protocol for phase two, and used the qualitative responses of each selected participant in the protocol as anchoring prompts. The final point of integration is in the analysis and meta-question, which includes an integrated data display. We found that leadership experience positively predicted ESE, and ESE positively predicted innovation. Through the transformation and integration of data, descriptions of each quadrant reveal relevant points of interest for preparing and supporting GECs.

Methods in PsychologyVol. 13
University of Connecticut (US), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.