Perceptions of Difficulty in an Automation-Supported Task

Technology users are increasingly given discretion around when to engage automated systems, however, these decisions are often suboptimal, inhibiting performance. Prior work has suggested that this may stem from improper estimates of task difficulty. This study investigated where perceived task difficulty diverged from objective task difficulty (accuracy) and its impact on automation use. In a visual search task, participants identified target objects in cluttered images and could opt to use an automated aid on certain trials. Results indicated that participants were sensitive to differences in difficulty, but they used the automation more often when they rated the task as more difficult. With automation present, performance was equivalent between the easy and difficult conditions, but participants rated the difficult condition as harder. This may suggest a disconnect between perceived difficulty and objective performance measures. These results highlight the importance of considering both subjective and objective difficulty when designing automated systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251360718
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Difficulty in an Automation-Supported Task

Colleen E. Patton, Jewel G. Padilla
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Perceptions of Difficulty in an Automation-Supported Task

Colleen E. Patton, Jewel G. Padilla
article en

Abstract

Technology users are increasingly given discretion around when to engage automated systems, however, these decisions are often suboptimal, inhibiting performance. Prior work has suggested that this may stem from improper estimates of task difficulty. This study investigated where perceived task difficulty diverged from objective task difficulty (accuracy) and its impact on automation use. In a visual search task, participants identified target objects in cluttered images and could opt to use an automated aid on certain trials. Results indicated that participants were sensitive to differences in difficulty, but they used the automation more often when they rated the task as more difficult. With automation present, performance was equivalent between the easy and difficult conditions, but participants rated the difficult condition as harder. This may suggest a disconnect between perceived difficulty and objective performance measures. These results highlight the importance of considering both subjective and objective difficulty when designing automated systems.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perceptions of Difficulty in an Automation-Supported Task — Colleen E. Patton, Jewel G. Padilla · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS