Evaluating sludge management strategies using wastewater treatment plant simulations and life cycle assessment

Abstract The goal of this study is to compare the environmental and energy performance of three sludge management scenarios at a wastewater treatment plant in Mexico, using process simulations and life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess energy use, environmental impacts, and costs. The functional unit is one cubic meter of treated influent wastewater, including sludge treatment and disposal. Screw press, thermal drying, and anaerobic digestion (AD) were assessed for energy use and environmental impacts, focusing on global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, and fossil resource scarcity. The Base Case scenario assumes a 50/50 distribution of wastewater flow between two biological treatment lines (anoxic/oxic and conventional activated sludge), with sludge equally treated by drying and screw pressing. The Best-Case scenario directs all flow to the anoxic/oxic line and treats all sludge through AD with electricity and heat recovery. Compared with the Base Case, the Best-Case scenario reduced energy use by 14%, corresponding to a specific energy savings of 0.04 kWh/m 3 , and achieved annual cost savings of 35,891 USD. The key challenges included limited data on sludge characteristics and disposal practices in Mexico, which required careful adaptation. LCA was enabled through process simulation, which provided site-specific inventory data despite limited regional reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-025-02375-5
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating sludge management strategies using wastewater treatment plant simulations and life cycle assessment

Frank J. Loge, Martín Esteban González‐López, Paloma Barajas-Álvarez, Jürgen Mahlknecht et al.
4 citations
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
3.99
article

Evaluating sludge management strategies using wastewater treatment plant simulations and life cycle assessment

Frank J. Loge, Martín Esteban González‐López, Paloma Barajas-Álvarez, Jürgen Mahlknecht, Misael Sebastián Gradilla‐Hernández, Carolina Senés‐Guerrero, Carlos Daniel García-López
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The goal of this study is to compare the environmental and energy performance of three sludge management scenarios at a wastewater treatment plant in Mexico, using process simulations and life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess energy use, environmental impacts, and costs. The functional unit is one cubic meter of treated influent wastewater, including sludge treatment and disposal. Screw press, thermal drying, and anaerobic digestion (AD) were assessed for energy use and environmental impacts, focusing on global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, and fossil resource scarcity. The Base Case scenario assumes a 50/50 distribution of wastewater flow between two biological treatment lines (anoxic/oxic and conventional activated sludge), with sludge equally treated by drying and screw pressing. The Best-Case scenario directs all flow to the anoxic/oxic line and treats all sludge through AD with electricity and heat recovery. Compared with the Base Case, the Best-Case scenario reduced energy use by 14%, corresponding to a specific energy savings of 0.04 kWh/m 3 , and achieved annual cost savings of 35,891 USD. The key challenges included limited data on sludge characteristics and disposal practices in Mexico, which required careful adaptation. LCA was enabled through process simulation, which provided site-specific inventory data despite limited regional reporting.

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste ManagementVol. 27(5)
University of California, Davis (US), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
3.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.