Anglicizing Chineseness and resisting self-Orientalism: A contrapuntal reading of Chinese writing in English

This article examines the understudied phenomenon of Chinese writers’ engagement with the Anglophone literary world against the backdrop of globalization. Drawing on Edward Said’s contrapuntal theory of reading, this article looks at how Chinese writers Lijia Zhang and Annie Wang thematically challenge self-Orientalism in their representations of China, while simultaneously preserving a realistic ambience of contemporary Chinese society through what Rey Chow defines as a “xenophonic” style of English (2014: 59), achieved by embedding Chinese expressions in their novels. The analysis demonstrates how Chinese writing in English engages with postcolonial and global Anglophone discourses, and offers a model to understand the resonance between both disciplines from the “expanding circle” of literatures written in English in nations where English is a foreign language (Kachru, 1998: 93).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Literature, critique, and empire today.
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30333962251357827
Primary Topic
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anglicizing Chineseness and resisting self-Orientalism: A contrapuntal reading of Chinese writing in English

Qianting Lu
Literature, critique, and empire today.
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
article

Anglicizing Chineseness and resisting self-Orientalism: A contrapuntal reading of Chinese writing in English

Qianting Lu
article en

Abstract

This article examines the understudied phenomenon of Chinese writers’ engagement with the Anglophone literary world against the backdrop of globalization. Drawing on Edward Said’s contrapuntal theory of reading, this article looks at how Chinese writers Lijia Zhang and Annie Wang thematically challenge self-Orientalism in their representations of China, while simultaneously preserving a realistic ambience of contemporary Chinese society through what Rey Chow defines as a “xenophonic” style of English (2014: 59), achieved by embedding Chinese expressions in their novels. The analysis demonstrates how Chinese writing in English engages with postcolonial and global Anglophone discourses, and offers a model to understand the resonance between both disciplines from the “expanding circle” of literatures written in English in nations where English is a foreign language (Kachru, 1998: 93).

Literature, critique, and empire today.
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anglicizing Chineseness and resisting self-Orientalism: A contrapuntal reading of Chinese writing in English — Qianting Lu · Literature, critique, and empire today. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS