Effects of riparian wetland restoration and grazing on <scp> CH <sub>4</sub> </scp> and <scp> CO <sub>2</sub> </scp> exchange more than a decade after rewetting

Abstract Introduction Riparian wetlands provide several important ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration. Drained and degraded wetlands act as carbon sources, but rewetting might result in elevated methane (CH 4 ) emissions and does not always reestablish a carbon sink. Objectives This study examines the impacts of riparian wetland restoration and disturbance regime (grazing vs. no grazing) on CH 4 and CO 2 exchanges in wetlands 12–17 years post‐restoration. Methods Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured using a static chamber at monthly intervals over a year to assess the effects of disturbance regime, groundwater level, and soil temperature on CH 4 and CO 2 exchange. Results Our results show no significant differences in CH 4 emissions between restored and near‐natural sites. We demonstrate that grazed sites, both near‐natural and restored, are net carbon sinks, while ungrazed sites are carbon sources. However, we did not capture the production from shrubs and trees which were abundant at near‐natural ungrazed sites and would be expected to act as carbon sinks. Conclusion Our results suggest that ecosystem functioning with respect to carbon cycling was reestablished post‐restoration, but that ecosystem function of the restored areas was contingent on the prevalent disturbance regime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70185
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of riparian wetland restoration and grazing on CH 4 and CO 2 exchange more than a decade after rewetting

Kaj Sand‐Jensen, Hans Henrik Bruun, Søren Jessen, Filippa Fredriksson et al.
Restoration Ecology
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
article

Effects of riparian wetland restoration and grazing on CH 4 and CO 2 exchange more than a decade after rewetting

Kaj Sand‐Jensen, Hans Henrik Bruun, Søren Jessen, Filippa Fredriksson, Marta Baumane, Kenneth Thorø Martinsen, Johan Emil Kjær, Lars Baastrup‐Spohr, Tobias Skjærlund, Andreas Krogh Norrild, Mads Edgar Rath Hansen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Riparian wetlands provide several important ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration. Drained and degraded wetlands act as carbon sources, but rewetting might result in elevated methane (CH 4 ) emissions and does not always reestablish a carbon sink. Objectives This study examines the impacts of riparian wetland restoration and disturbance regime (grazing vs. no grazing) on CH 4 and CO 2 exchanges in wetlands 12–17 years post‐restoration. Methods Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured using a static chamber at monthly intervals over a year to assess the effects of disturbance regime, groundwater level, and soil temperature on CH 4 and CO 2 exchange. Results Our results show no significant differences in CH 4 emissions between restored and near‐natural sites. We demonstrate that grazed sites, both near‐natural and restored, are net carbon sinks, while ungrazed sites are carbon sources. However, we did not capture the production from shrubs and trees which were abundant at near‐natural ungrazed sites and would be expected to act as carbon sinks. Conclusion Our results suggest that ecosystem functioning with respect to carbon cycling was reestablished post‐restoration, but that ecosystem function of the restored areas was contingent on the prevalent disturbance regime.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(8)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK), University College Copenhagen (DK), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Carlsbergfondet, Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.