Performance of two‐to‐one non‐contact post‐installed lap splices

Abstract Post‐installed lap splices ensure the continuity of steel reinforcement in concrete‐to‐concrete connections by overlapping cast‐in (CI) reinforcing bars (rebars) with post‐installed (PI) rebars. Typically, the design of such splices follows provisions originally intended for CI lap splices, despite the differences in execution and bond performance. This study introduces a novel design concept for PI lap splices, where two CI rebars are overlapped with a centrally placed PI rebar using high‐performance injection mortar. Different slab connections with rebar diameter from 12 to 16 mm in normal‐strength concrete were tested in four‐point bending with static loading. The clear spacing between the overlapped bars varied from 4 to 8. Experimental results for the two‐to‐one non‐contact PI lap splices show similar strength, stiffness, and ductility compared to reference configurations with continuous bars as well as one‐to‐one CI and PI lap splices. The ultimate strength is always limited by the anchorage of the CI rebars within the lap splice, exceeding the predictions by the current and next‐generation Eurocode 2 design formulae.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70311
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of two‐to‐one non‐contact post‐installed lap splices

José I. Croppi, Roberto Piccinin, Alexander Ahrens, Alessandro Palmeri et al.
3 links
Structural Concrete
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Performance of two‐to‐one non‐contact post‐installed lap splices

José I. Croppi, Roberto Piccinin, Alexander Ahrens, Alessandro Palmeri, Peter Mark
article en

Abstract

Abstract Post‐installed lap splices ensure the continuity of steel reinforcement in concrete‐to‐concrete connections by overlapping cast‐in (CI) reinforcing bars (rebars) with post‐installed (PI) rebars. Typically, the design of such splices follows provisions originally intended for CI lap splices, despite the differences in execution and bond performance. This study introduces a novel design concept for PI lap splices, where two CI rebars are overlapped with a centrally placed PI rebar using high‐performance injection mortar. Different slab connections with rebar diameter from 12 to 16 mm in normal‐strength concrete were tested in four‐point bending with static loading. The clear spacing between the overlapped bars varied from 4 to 8. Experimental results for the two‐to‐one non‐contact PI lap splices show similar strength, stiffness, and ductility compared to reference configurations with continuous bars as well as one‐to‐one CI and PI lap splices. The ultimate strength is always limited by the anchorage of the CI rebars within the lap splice, exceeding the predictions by the current and next‐generation Eurocode 2 design formulae.

Structural ConcreteVol. 27(1)
Ruhr University Bochum (DE), Hilti (Liechtenstein) (LI)
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.