Differences in Naturalistic Deception Between Autistic and Neurotypical Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Autistic individuals may be perceived as less honest than neurotypical counterparts, particularly when their neurotype is unknown. However, findings on naturalistic deception in autism remain mixed. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined naturalistic deception differences between autistic and neurotypical individuals. Sixteen studies (430 autistic and 430 neurotypical participants) were identified through searches of five databases (1994 to July 2024). A meta-analysis on 10 studies revealed that across studies, autistic participants deceived significantly less than neurotypical participants in hide-and-seek tasks, but showed no significant difference in temptation resistance tasks. Due to heterogeneity across studies, potential moderators such as age, gender, and experimenter neurotype could not be investigated. Findings have implications for improving understanding of autistic individuals’ communication preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-025-00521-1
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Naturalistic Deception Between Autistic and Neurotypical Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nicole Dargue, Avni Bharadwaj, Michael Jones, Naomi Sweller
1 links
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Differences in Naturalistic Deception Between Autistic and Neurotypical Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nicole Dargue, Avni Bharadwaj, Michael Jones, Naomi Sweller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Autistic individuals may be perceived as less honest than neurotypical counterparts, particularly when their neurotype is unknown. However, findings on naturalistic deception in autism remain mixed. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined naturalistic deception differences between autistic and neurotypical individuals. Sixteen studies (430 autistic and 430 neurotypical participants) were identified through searches of five databases (1994 to July 2024). A meta-analysis on 10 studies revealed that across studies, autistic participants deceived significantly less than neurotypical participants in hide-and-seek tasks, but showed no significant difference in temptation resistance tasks. Due to heterogeneity across studies, potential moderators such as age, gender, and experimenter neurotype could not be investigated. Findings have implications for improving understanding of autistic individuals’ communication preferences.

Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Griffith University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differences in Naturalistic Deception Between Autistic and Neurotypical Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis — Nicole Dargue, Avni Bharadwaj, et al. · Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS