The Cross-Cultural Ability of the Inventory of Problems-29-M (IOP-29-M) to Detect Feigned Symptom Presentations: A Replication of Akca et al. (2023) on a Romanian-Speaking Sample

This study replicated research on the ability of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) to detect honest, feigning, and random responding, and investigated the accuracy of its memory module (IOP-M) in a Romanian-speaking sample. 127 participants, randomized into three groups, were assessed online with the IOP-29-M, in each responding condition. The standard cutoff of >=.50 on the IOP-29 False Disorders Probability Scale accurately discriminated honest from feigned protocols. The Random Responding Scale showed promise in indicating careless responding. Combining the IOP-29 FDS and IOP-M improved classification accuracies. Results support the IOP-29-M's cross-cultural validity and its utility in forensic and clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2025.2551646
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cross-Cultural Ability of the Inventory of Problems-29-M (IOP-29-M) to Detect Feigned Symptom Presentations: A Replication of Akca et al. (2023) on a Romanian-Speaking Sample

Mugur Ciumăgeanu, Iulia Crișan, Luciano Giromini, Ali Yunus Emre Akca et al.
2 citations
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
2.71
article

The Cross-Cultural Ability of the Inventory of Problems-29-M (IOP-29-M) to Detect Feigned Symptom Presentations: A Replication of Akca et al. (2023) on a Romanian-Speaking Sample

Mugur Ciumăgeanu, Iulia Crișan, Luciano Giromini, Ali Yunus Emre Akca, Samira Maria Voin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study replicated research on the ability of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) to detect honest, feigning, and random responding, and investigated the accuracy of its memory module (IOP-M) in a Romanian-speaking sample. 127 participants, randomized into three groups, were assessed online with the IOP-29-M, in each responding condition. The standard cutoff of >=.50 on the IOP-29 False Disorders Probability Scale accurately discriminated honest from feigned protocols. The Random Responding Scale showed promise in indicating careless responding. Combining the IOP-29 FDS and IOP-M improved classification accuracies. Results support the IOP-29-M's cross-cultural validity and its utility in forensic and clinical settings.

Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
West University of Timişoara (RO), Maastricht University (NL), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.