Campaigning for whom?

Abstract This research note examines issue salience in the 2025 German federal election, focusing on how voters’ top priorities differ across gender, age, education, and voting intention. Using data from a survey conducted among users of the voting advice application Voteswiper during the last three weeks before the election in February 2025, we analyze which topics were most important for different social and partisan groups during the campaign. Our findings reveal distinct patterns: women prioritize social justice and climate policy more than men, while men emphasize migration and economic policy. Younger voters show stronger concerns for climate policy and social inequality, whereas older voters prioritize migration and economic policy. These gender and age-based differences are not uniform but rather depend on the moderation of the other variable. Partisan differences largely align with established issue ownership patterns, with Green supporters emphasizing climate policy, AfD supporters focusing on migration, and FDP and CDU/CSU supporters prioritizing economic concerns. These variations highlight how social and political identities shape voter preferences and indicate potential mismatches between campaign narratives and electorate priorities. A case in point is the CDU/CSU’s campaign strategy with a focus on migration being at odds with their electorate prioritizing economic policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-025-00644-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Campaigning for whom?

Sebastian Jäckle, Kira Renée Kurz, Ronald Schleehauf, Judith Reinbold et al.
2 citations
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
Social Policy and Reform Studies
17.04
article

Campaigning for whom?

Sebastian Jäckle, Kira Renée Kurz, Ronald Schleehauf, Judith Reinbold, Marius Fröhle
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This research note examines issue salience in the 2025 German federal election, focusing on how voters’ top priorities differ across gender, age, education, and voting intention. Using data from a survey conducted among users of the voting advice application Voteswiper during the last three weeks before the election in February 2025, we analyze which topics were most important for different social and partisan groups during the campaign. Our findings reveal distinct patterns: women prioritize social justice and climate policy more than men, while men emphasize migration and economic policy. Younger voters show stronger concerns for climate policy and social inequality, whereas older voters prioritize migration and economic policy. These gender and age-based differences are not uniform but rather depend on the moderation of the other variable. Partisan differences largely align with established issue ownership patterns, with Green supporters emphasizing climate policy, AfD supporters focusing on migration, and FDP and CDU/CSU supporters prioritizing economic concerns. These variations highlight how social and political identities shape voter preferences and indicate potential mismatches between campaign narratives and electorate priorities. A case in point is the CDU/CSU’s campaign strategy with a focus on migration being at odds with their electorate prioritizing economic policy.

Zeitschrift für Vergleichende PolitikwissenschaftVol. 19(3)
University of Freiburg (DE), Sociétés, Acteurs, Gouvernement en Europe (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.