Text and context in interpreting philosophical traditions: Global and islamic perspectives

Background: The interpretation of texts in philosophical studies reflects an epistemological dynamic that extends beyond mere literal meaning, encompassing the historical, social, and cultural contexts in which texts are situated. This complexity underscores the evolving nature of textual meaning across different eras and intellectual traditions. Methods: This study employs a comparative approach to analyze interpretive methodologies within Western and Islamic schools of philosophy. It focuses on selected hermeneutical frameworks to explore how texts are reinterpreted in relation to changing historical and cultural contexts. Findings: In Western hermeneutics, approaches such as Gadamer’s fusion of horizons and Ricoeur’s narrative symbolism highlight the active interplay between the reader and the text. These perspectives emphasize meaning as a dialogical process shaped by both historical consciousness and linguistic structures. In contrast, the Islamic tradition offers interpretive models like Fazlur Rahman’s double movement, Abdullah Saeed’s contextual hermeneutics, and Mulla Sadra’s tafsir hikmah (philosophical exegesis), which strive to reinterpret revelation within the frameworks of modernity, spirituality, and rationality. These methods reflect an ongoing engagement with divine texts in light of contemporary challenges. Conclusion: The comparison reveals that both Western and Islamic philosophical traditions recognize the critical role of context in the process of textual interpretation. However, they are grounded in distinct theological assumptions and methodological orientations, which shape their respective hermeneutical outcomes. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study contributes to the field by bridging philosophical hermeneutics from two major intellectual traditions—Western and Islamic—demonstrating their convergences in contextual sensitivity while highlighting their foundational differences. It offers a nuanced understanding of how meaning is negotiated across cultural and religious boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Islamic Perspective on Communication and Psychology
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61511/ipercop.v2i2.2025.2222
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Text and context in interpreting philosophical traditions: Global and islamic perspectives

Wahyuningsih Wahyuningsih
1 citations
Islamic Perspective on Communication and Psychology
Education and Islamic Studies
8.93
article

Text and context in interpreting philosophical traditions: Global and islamic perspectives

Wahyuningsih Wahyuningsih
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The interpretation of texts in philosophical studies reflects an epistemological dynamic that extends beyond mere literal meaning, encompassing the historical, social, and cultural contexts in which texts are situated. This complexity underscores the evolving nature of textual meaning across different eras and intellectual traditions. Methods: This study employs a comparative approach to analyze interpretive methodologies within Western and Islamic schools of philosophy. It focuses on selected hermeneutical frameworks to explore how texts are reinterpreted in relation to changing historical and cultural contexts. Findings: In Western hermeneutics, approaches such as Gadamer’s fusion of horizons and Ricoeur’s narrative symbolism highlight the active interplay between the reader and the text. These perspectives emphasize meaning as a dialogical process shaped by both historical consciousness and linguistic structures. In contrast, the Islamic tradition offers interpretive models like Fazlur Rahman’s double movement, Abdullah Saeed’s contextual hermeneutics, and Mulla Sadra’s tafsir hikmah (philosophical exegesis), which strive to reinterpret revelation within the frameworks of modernity, spirituality, and rationality. These methods reflect an ongoing engagement with divine texts in light of contemporary challenges. Conclusion: The comparison reveals that both Western and Islamic philosophical traditions recognize the critical role of context in the process of textual interpretation. However, they are grounded in distinct theological assumptions and methodological orientations, which shape their respective hermeneutical outcomes. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study contributes to the field by bridging philosophical hermeneutics from two major intellectual traditions—Western and Islamic—demonstrating their convergences in contextual sensitivity while highlighting their foundational differences. It offers a nuanced understanding of how meaning is negotiated across cultural and religious boundaries.

Islamic Perspective on Communication and PsychologyVol. 2(2)
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Education and Islamic Studies
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Text and context in interpreting philosophical traditions: Global and islamic perspectives — Wahyuningsih Wahyuningsih · Islamic Perspective on Communication and Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS