Examining the impact mechanism of intra-team co-opetition on employee creative deviance

Background Creative deviance is key to producing breakthrough innovations and maintaining core competencies for a team. In contrast, intra-team co-opetition, an important influence on the allocation of team resources, may affect employees' creative deviance. Methods This study analyzed the impact mechanism of intra-team co-opetition on employee creative deviance based on the conservation of resources theory. We collected data from 205 employees in scenario experiment and 354 employees in the questionnaire. Results The findings of polynomial regression and response surface analysis indicate that consistency in competition and cooperation within teams can lead to lesser knowledge power loss. When competition and cooperation levels within teams are inconsistent, they may not be able to attain their intended results. Furthermore, we found that when competition and cooperation levels within teams are inconsistent, knowledge power loss in the “low competition-high cooperation” combination was lower than the “high competition-low cooperation” combination. Thus, knowledge power loss can mediate between intra-team co-opetition and employee creative deviance. Conclusion This study reveals the micro-mechanism of different combinations of co-opetition within the team, enriches the research results in the field of co-opetition and creative deviance, and provides reference for promoting team innovation performance and emerging more breakthrough innovation achievements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2025.1576922
Primary Topic
Business Strategy and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the impact mechanism of intra-team co-opetition on employee creative deviance

Xufan Zhang, Min Zhang, Lei Wang, Qing Lin et al.
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Business Strategy and Innovation
article

Examining the impact mechanism of intra-team co-opetition on employee creative deviance

Xufan Zhang, Min Zhang, Lei Wang, Qing Lin, Siyu He, Jinyu Zhang, Z. Nie
article en

Abstract

Background Creative deviance is key to producing breakthrough innovations and maintaining core competencies for a team. In contrast, intra-team co-opetition, an important influence on the allocation of team resources, may affect employees' creative deviance. Methods This study analyzed the impact mechanism of intra-team co-opetition on employee creative deviance based on the conservation of resources theory. We collected data from 205 employees in scenario experiment and 354 employees in the questionnaire. Results The findings of polynomial regression and response surface analysis indicate that consistency in competition and cooperation within teams can lead to lesser knowledge power loss. When competition and cooperation levels within teams are inconsistent, they may not be able to attain their intended results. Furthermore, we found that when competition and cooperation levels within teams are inconsistent, knowledge power loss in the “low competition-high cooperation” combination was lower than the “high competition-low cooperation” combination. Thus, knowledge power loss can mediate between intra-team co-opetition and employee creative deviance. Conclusion This study reveals the micro-mechanism of different combinations of co-opetition within the team, enriches the research results in the field of co-opetition and creative deviance, and provides reference for promoting team innovation performance and emerging more breakthrough innovation achievements.

Frontiers in Organizational PsychologyVol. 3
Nanjing Normal University (CN), Hunan University of Arts and Science (CN), Nantong University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Business Strategy and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.