Resistance and Submission: Encountering Fate in Bonhoeffer's Prison Letters

Abstract “Submission” does not often feature in titles on Dietrich Bonhoeffer's life and thought; he has become, singularly, a theologian “of resistance.” Yet the German title of his prison writings— Widerstand und Ergebung [ Resistance and Submission ]—reveals a more agile approach when it comes to one's “fate” [ das Schicksal ]. In this essay I argue that Bonhoeffer offers a distinct theological and ethical stance for facing the circumstances that are sent to us. I first situate his reflections within a broader historical frame, showing how patristic and medieval theologians either rejected or accommodated fate with respect to God's providence, then I outline politically charged references to the concept of fate among Bonhoeffer's Lutheran contemporaries—Emanuel Hirsch, Paul Althaus, and Werner Elert. I next analyze how Bonhoeffer creatively engages with the question of fate by employing both the Ich‐Du encounter of personalist philosophy and Martin Luther's conviction that the course of events can be perceived as a “mask” of God. In so doing, I demonstrate that Bonhoeffer offers a nuanced alternative to ethical theories that focus on active agency without a passive or receptive corollary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Theology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.70031
Primary Topic
Christian Theology and Mission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resistance and Submission: Encountering Fate in Bonhoeffer's Prison Letters

David S. Robinson
Modern Theology
Christian Theology and Mission
article

Resistance and Submission: Encountering Fate in Bonhoeffer's Prison Letters

David S. Robinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract “Submission” does not often feature in titles on Dietrich Bonhoeffer's life and thought; he has become, singularly, a theologian “of resistance.” Yet the German title of his prison writings— Widerstand und Ergebung [ Resistance and Submission ]—reveals a more agile approach when it comes to one's “fate” [ das Schicksal ]. In this essay I argue that Bonhoeffer offers a distinct theological and ethical stance for facing the circumstances that are sent to us. I first situate his reflections within a broader historical frame, showing how patristic and medieval theologians either rejected or accommodated fate with respect to God's providence, then I outline politically charged references to the concept of fate among Bonhoeffer's Lutheran contemporaries—Emanuel Hirsch, Paul Althaus, and Werner Elert. I next analyze how Bonhoeffer creatively engages with the question of fate by employing both the Ich‐Du encounter of personalist philosophy and Martin Luther's conviction that the course of events can be perceived as a “mask” of God. In so doing, I demonstrate that Bonhoeffer offers a nuanced alternative to ethical theories that focus on active agency without a passive or receptive corollary.

Modern Theology
Regent College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Christian Theology and Mission
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.