Estimation of deposition rate in robotic-controlled wire arc additive manufacturing: implementation of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms

Purpose Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) is characterised by a higher deposition rate compared to other metal additive manufacturing processes. This study aims to estimate the deposition rate for single-layer deposited beads during the WAAM process using state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. Design/methodology/approach In this study, six machine learning algorithms, lasso regression, ridge regression, random forest (RF), XGBoost, Gaussian process regression (GPR) and artificial neural network (ANN), were used for the development of predictive modelling of deposition rate in WAAM with three input parameters. The data set was collected by conducting experimental trials. Findings ANN was highly efficient in attaining a higher coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.97 for testing. Mean square error and mean absolute error were acceptable, and predictions were very close to the actual value and better than lasso and ridge regressions. Three models, GPR, RF and XGBoost, were found ineffective due to lower performance and accuracy, so they were not used for the final prediction. Research limitations/implications Due to the limitation of conducting a large number of experimental trials in the research laboratory, only a small data set was considered in this study. In addition, a single-layer bead deposition was carried out to simplify the data collection task for obtaining the experimental value of the deposition rate. Practical implications Implementation of machine learning techniques for manufacturing processes, particularly for optimisation or estimation of process parameters and output responses, is very important. This case study can help manufacturing engineers and production managers implement machine learning in an industrial environment to improve the quality and overall performance of manufacturing processes. Originality/value Using machine learning for the estimation of the actual deposition rate in WAAM with higher accuracy is possible with minimal assumptions. Hence, it gives more accurate results compared to analytical and mathematical calculations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-01-2024-0056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of deposition rate in robotic-controlled wire arc additive manufacturing: implementation of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms

Amitava Mandal, Mukesh Chandra, Alok Kumar Das, Kashif Hasan Kazmi
1 citations
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

Estimation of deposition rate in robotic-controlled wire arc additive manufacturing: implementation of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms

Amitava Mandal, Mukesh Chandra, Alok Kumar Das, Kashif Hasan Kazmi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) is characterised by a higher deposition rate compared to other metal additive manufacturing processes. This study aims to estimate the deposition rate for single-layer deposited beads during the WAAM process using state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. Design/methodology/approach In this study, six machine learning algorithms, lasso regression, ridge regression, random forest (RF), XGBoost, Gaussian process regression (GPR) and artificial neural network (ANN), were used for the development of predictive modelling of deposition rate in WAAM with three input parameters. The data set was collected by conducting experimental trials. Findings ANN was highly efficient in attaining a higher coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.97 for testing. Mean square error and mean absolute error were acceptable, and predictions were very close to the actual value and better than lasso and ridge regressions. Three models, GPR, RF and XGBoost, were found ineffective due to lower performance and accuracy, so they were not used for the final prediction. Research limitations/implications Due to the limitation of conducting a large number of experimental trials in the research laboratory, only a small data set was considered in this study. In addition, a single-layer bead deposition was carried out to simplify the data collection task for obtaining the experimental value of the deposition rate. Practical implications Implementation of machine learning techniques for manufacturing processes, particularly for optimisation or estimation of process parameters and output responses, is very important. This case study can help manufacturing engineers and production managers implement machine learning in an industrial environment to improve the quality and overall performance of manufacturing processes. Originality/value Using machine learning for the estimation of the actual deposition rate in WAAM with higher accuracy is possible with minimal assumptions. Hence, it gives more accurate results compared to analytical and mathematical calculations.

Rapid Prototyping JournalVol. 31(10)
Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN), Bansal Institute Of Research Technology & Science (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.