A Strategic Perspective for Green Revolution 2.0: Applying Game Theory Based Decision-Making Frameworks for Smart and Natural Farming in India

In this conceptual paper, the author develops and presents a strategic decision-making framework that applies game theory to evaluate smart and natural farming approaches in India. In the face of increasing pressures from climate change, resource scarcity, and evolving socio-economic landscapes, agriculture must adapt to the challenges of a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world. When integrated with the Provision of Urban Amenities in Rural Areas (PURA) framework, VUCA offers a dynamic system perspective that contextualizes uncertainty and institutional capacity in farming systems. This study applies a modified Spence signaling model to capture how farmers—categorized as smart or natural versus conventional—choose to signal their sustainability credentials in an environment of asymmetric information. Using a combination of payoff matrix modelling, Bayesian belief updating, and evolutionary game simulations, the paper identifies strategic equilibria under varying levels of policy support, consumer trust, and signal cost. Farmers’ decisions to adopt smart technologies or organic certifications are modelled as costly but credible signals of quality. These signals are then interpreted by receivers such as consumers, investors, or policymakers, who in turn adjust their support or market preferences. The analysis reveals conditions under which separating, pooling, and semi-separating equilibria emerge, and how these outcomes impact farmer behaviour and systemic sustainability. Case studies from Indian states such as Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Punjab demonstrate how real-world farming programs mirror theoretical outcomes under different signalling strategies. The study also presents a robust methodological structure, combining conceptual modelling with policy simulation and validation through comparative cases. By integrating environmental, technological, and institutional perspectives, this paper contributes a hybrid strategic framework aligned with India’s Green Revolution 2.0 goals. It offers practical recommendations for policy design, infrastructure planning, and market mechanisms that support the scaling of sustainable agricultural practicesthrough credible signalling and game-theoretic insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2025.02.002
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Strategic Perspective for Green Revolution 2.0: Applying Game Theory Based Decision-Making Frameworks for Smart and Natural Farming in India

Senthil Kumar Anantharaman
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

A Strategic Perspective for Green Revolution 2.0: Applying Game Theory Based Decision-Making Frameworks for Smart and Natural Farming in India

Senthil Kumar Anantharaman
article en

Abstract

In this conceptual paper, the author develops and presents a strategic decision-making framework that applies game theory to evaluate smart and natural farming approaches in India. In the face of increasing pressures from climate change, resource scarcity, and evolving socio-economic landscapes, agriculture must adapt to the challenges of a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world. When integrated with the Provision of Urban Amenities in Rural Areas (PURA) framework, VUCA offers a dynamic system perspective that contextualizes uncertainty and institutional capacity in farming systems. This study applies a modified Spence signaling model to capture how farmers—categorized as smart or natural versus conventional—choose to signal their sustainability credentials in an environment of asymmetric information. Using a combination of payoff matrix modelling, Bayesian belief updating, and evolutionary game simulations, the paper identifies strategic equilibria under varying levels of policy support, consumer trust, and signal cost. Farmers’ decisions to adopt smart technologies or organic certifications are modelled as costly but credible signals of quality. These signals are then interpreted by receivers such as consumers, investors, or policymakers, who in turn adjust their support or market preferences. The analysis reveals conditions under which separating, pooling, and semi-separating equilibria emerge, and how these outcomes impact farmer behaviour and systemic sustainability. Case studies from Indian states such as Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Punjab demonstrate how real-world farming programs mirror theoretical outcomes under different signalling strategies. The study also presents a robust methodological structure, combining conceptual modelling with policy simulation and validation through comparative cases. By integrating environmental, technological, and institutional perspectives, this paper contributes a hybrid strategic framework aligned with India’s Green Revolution 2.0 goals. It offers practical recommendations for policy design, infrastructure planning, and market mechanisms that support the scaling of sustainable agricultural practicesthrough credible signalling and game-theoretic insights.

Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology AVol. 15(2)
Indian Institute of Management Indore (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.