Aphantasia and the unconscious imagery hypothesis

Until recently, mental imagery has largely been regarded as an exclusively conscious phenomenon. However, recent empirical results suggest that mental imagery can also occur unconsciously. People who report having no experiences of mental imagery often perform similar to controls on behavioural tasks thought to require imagery. A surprising number of them also display significant levels of imagery-based priming, and recent neural decoding studies have shown that imagery-related information is being processed in their visual cortex. However, investigating unconscious imagery empirically is not straightforward. One challenge is to establish that imagery is genuinely unconscious as opposed to merely going unreported due to response biases. Another is to clarify how imagistic and indirect perceptual processing needs to be to qualify as imagery. In this paper, we take a closer look at the evidence for unconscious imagery, argue that it is not as compelling as it initially appears, and outline a strategy for advancing research on this question.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consciousness and Cognition
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2025.103924
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aphantasia and the unconscious imagery hypothesis

Andy Mckilliam, Manuela Kirberg
3 citations
Consciousness and Cognition
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
6.35
article

Aphantasia and the unconscious imagery hypothesis

Andy Mckilliam, Manuela Kirberg
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Until recently, mental imagery has largely been regarded as an exclusively conscious phenomenon. However, recent empirical results suggest that mental imagery can also occur unconsciously. People who report having no experiences of mental imagery often perform similar to controls on behavioural tasks thought to require imagery. A surprising number of them also display significant levels of imagery-based priming, and recent neural decoding studies have shown that imagery-related information is being processed in their visual cortex. However, investigating unconscious imagery empirically is not straightforward. One challenge is to establish that imagery is genuinely unconscious as opposed to merely going unreported due to response biases. Another is to clarify how imagistic and indirect perceptual processing needs to be to qualify as imagery. In this paper, we take a closer look at the evidence for unconscious imagery, argue that it is not as compelling as it initially appears, and outline a strategy for advancing research on this question.

Consciousness and CognitionVol. 135
Monash University (AU)
Australian Government, National Taiwan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
6.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Aphantasia and the unconscious imagery hypothesis — Andy Mckilliam, Manuela Kirberg · Consciousness and Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS