On podiatric surgery

Podiatric surgery is a registered specialty in Australia, supported by nationally accredited training programs and decades of safe, effective practice. Despite this, podiatric surgeons are excluded from public hospitals and government-funded services, eliminating their ability to contribute to high-demand areas of surgical care. This commentary explores systemic barriers to the integration of podiatric surgeons within the Australian health system. It draws on national regulatory frameworks, clinical audit data, and international comparisons including interprofessional agreements in the United Kingdom and United States, to examine how a well-trained but vastly underutilised specialist surgical workforce remains siloed outside public care. Structural reforms would allow podiatric surgeons to participate in multidisciplinary teams, reduce surgical waiting times, and support patients with complex foot and ankle conditions, especially those with conditions such as diabetic foot disease, that are known to deteriorate with time, and patients from marginalised and remote demographics. International examples show that enabling access and removing funding exclusions improve service equity, alleviate surgical bottlenecks, and bring Australia in line with global best practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On podiatric surgery

Steven R Edwards
1 citations
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
1.03
article

On podiatric surgery

Steven R Edwards
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Podiatric surgery is a registered specialty in Australia, supported by nationally accredited training programs and decades of safe, effective practice. Despite this, podiatric surgeons are excluded from public hospitals and government-funded services, eliminating their ability to contribute to high-demand areas of surgical care. This commentary explores systemic barriers to the integration of podiatric surgeons within the Australian health system. It draws on national regulatory frameworks, clinical audit data, and international comparisons including interprofessional agreements in the United Kingdom and United States, to examine how a well-trained but vastly underutilised specialist surgical workforce remains siloed outside public care. Structural reforms would allow podiatric surgeons to participate in multidisciplinary teams, reduce surgical waiting times, and support patients with complex foot and ankle conditions, especially those with conditions such as diabetic foot disease, that are known to deteriorate with time, and patients from marginalised and remote demographics. International examples show that enabling access and removing funding exclusions improve service equity, alleviate surgical bottlenecks, and bring Australia in line with global best practice.

Journal of Foot and Ankle ResearchVol. 18(3)
La Trobe University
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On podiatric surgery — Steven R Edwards · Journal of Foot and Ankle Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS