The ecosystem traits index is proposed as a composite index of ecosystem robustness for use in marine resource management

Ecosystem structure and function are seldom represented in ecological indicators used for resource management and conservation, despite their central position in stated objectives of international agreements and national policy on maintaining and conserving global ecosystems. Network theory provides capacity to change this situation. Inspired by the use of composite indicators in emergency warning, planning systems and in network analyses in many other applications, we show that a small suite of network-based indicators can provide a practical basis for measuring ecosystem structure in fisheries management. We suggest an Ecosystem Traits Index (ETI) that provides a rating of the combined ecosystem state and structural integrity. This index combines information captured by: the Hub index, which identifies species critical to system function; Gao's resilience score, which provides a measure of system resilience due to the density of connections and flow patterns in the ecosystem's food web; and the "Green Band" index (which measures pressure on ecosystem structure due to the mortality from human activities such as harvesting). Applying these indices to marine ecosystems of very different types showed that the combination of indicators is informative in each case and that each ecosystem's unique state results from fishing pressure, environmental change, and inherent ecosystem structural robustness. Simulation-based tests demonstrated the indicators rapidly respond to, and consistently reflect, ecosystem state changes across marine ecosystem types, though they cannot distinguish the effects of individual stressors such as fishing mortality, habitat modification, climate or other environmental changes. We have focused on fisheries because fishery indicators should, in principle, have utility across any form of marine ecosystem pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15322-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ecosystem traits index is proposed as a composite index of ecosystem robustness for use in marine resource management

Keith Sainsbury, Elizabeth A. Fulton
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Marine and fisheries research
1.11
article

The ecosystem traits index is proposed as a composite index of ecosystem robustness for use in marine resource management

Keith Sainsbury, Elizabeth A. Fulton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ecosystem structure and function are seldom represented in ecological indicators used for resource management and conservation, despite their central position in stated objectives of international agreements and national policy on maintaining and conserving global ecosystems. Network theory provides capacity to change this situation. Inspired by the use of composite indicators in emergency warning, planning systems and in network analyses in many other applications, we show that a small suite of network-based indicators can provide a practical basis for measuring ecosystem structure in fisheries management. We suggest an Ecosystem Traits Index (ETI) that provides a rating of the combined ecosystem state and structural integrity. This index combines information captured by: the Hub index, which identifies species critical to system function; Gao's resilience score, which provides a measure of system resilience due to the density of connections and flow patterns in the ecosystem's food web; and the "Green Band" index (which measures pressure on ecosystem structure due to the mortality from human activities such as harvesting). Applying these indices to marine ecosystems of very different types showed that the combination of indicators is informative in each case and that each ecosystem's unique state results from fishing pressure, environmental change, and inherent ecosystem structural robustness. Simulation-based tests demonstrated the indicators rapidly respond to, and consistently reflect, ecosystem state changes across marine ecosystem types, though they cannot distinguish the effects of individual stressors such as fishing mortality, habitat modification, climate or other environmental changes. We have focused on fisheries because fishery indicators should, in principle, have utility across any form of marine ecosystem pressure.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Australian Antarctic Division (AU), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU)
University of Washington, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Marine and fisheries research
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.