DEPICTION OF THE COSSACK UPRISING OF 1630 UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF TARAS TRYASYLO IN POLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE LATE 19th – FIRST THIRD OF THE 20th CENTURIES

The article analyses the specifics of the approaches of Polish historians who worked in the period from the late 19th century to the beginning of the Second World War to the study of the history of the Cossack uprising of 1630 under the leadership of T. Triasylo and the peculiarities of his assessments. The study of the Polish perspective on the events of 1630 not only provides a beter understanding of these events from an alternative, often opposing, Polish viewpoint but also allows for an exploration of the distinctive features of the Polish perception of the Ukrainian people, both in their past and present. The author identifies the significant interest of Polish historians of that time in the problem of the history of the Cossack uprising of 1630 led by T. Triasylo. Among the reasons for the uprising, scholars have identified conflicts between registered and non-registered Cossacks, the struggle of the Cossacks for their estate rights, and especially the inter-confessional confrontation between Orthodox and Catholics. For numerous researchers, the image of the uprising was limited to the events of «Taras’ s Night», which became symbolic for the historical memory of the Polish and Ukrainian peoples and gained legendary features. More detailed descriptions of the military campaign of 1630 in the studies of T. Korzon and W. Tomkiewicz were often filled with attempts to downplay the scale of Polish losses and show it as a victory for the crown troops. In the depiction of the finale of the battle and the Pereyaslav Treaty, there were different assessments of them either as victories of Hetman Koniecpolski and his kind treatment of the supposedly defeated rebels, or as agreements that only postponed a new major war and failed to curb the Cossacks. The paper summarizes that these approaches were often driven by the efforts of Polish researchers to use history to «strengthen the hearts» of the Polish people during the stateless period and to foster patriotism in the interwar period.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ukraine Cultural Heritage National Identity Statehood
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33402/ukr.2025-41-110-121
Primary Topic
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DEPICTION OF THE COSSACK UPRISING OF 1630 UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF TARAS TRYASYLO IN POLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE LATE 19th – FIRST THIRD OF THE 20th CENTURIES

Rostyslav BURDYAK
Ukraine Cultural Heritage National Identity Statehood
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
article

DEPICTION OF THE COSSACK UPRISING OF 1630 UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF TARAS TRYASYLO IN POLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE LATE 19th – FIRST THIRD OF THE 20th CENTURIES

Rostyslav BURDYAK
article en

Abstract

The article analyses the specifics of the approaches of Polish historians who worked in the period from the late 19th century to the beginning of the Second World War to the study of the history of the Cossack uprising of 1630 under the leadership of T. Triasylo and the peculiarities of his assessments. The study of the Polish perspective on the events of 1630 not only provides a beter understanding of these events from an alternative, often opposing, Polish viewpoint but also allows for an exploration of the distinctive features of the Polish perception of the Ukrainian people, both in their past and present. The author identifies the significant interest of Polish historians of that time in the problem of the history of the Cossack uprising of 1630 led by T. Triasylo. Among the reasons for the uprising, scholars have identified conflicts between registered and non-registered Cossacks, the struggle of the Cossacks for their estate rights, and especially the inter-confessional confrontation between Orthodox and Catholics. For numerous researchers, the image of the uprising was limited to the events of «Taras’ s Night», which became symbolic for the historical memory of the Polish and Ukrainian peoples and gained legendary features. More detailed descriptions of the military campaign of 1630 in the studies of T. Korzon and W. Tomkiewicz were often filled with attempts to downplay the scale of Polish losses and show it as a victory for the crown troops. In the depiction of the finale of the battle and the Pereyaslav Treaty, there were different assessments of them either as victories of Hetman Koniecpolski and his kind treatment of the supposedly defeated rebels, or as agreements that only postponed a new major war and failed to curb the Cossacks. The paper summarizes that these approaches were often driven by the efforts of Polish researchers to use history to «strengthen the hearts» of the Polish people during the stateless period and to foster patriotism in the interwar period.

Ukraine Cultural Heritage National Identity StatehoodVol. 41
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DEPICTION OF THE COSSACK UPRISING OF 1630 UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF TARAS TRYASYLO IN POLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE LATE 19th – FIRST THIRD OF THE 20th CENTURIES — Rostyslav BURDYAK · Ukraine Cultural Heritage National Identity Statehood (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS